Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19376256›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2009

Metabolic mapping of rat forebrain and midbrain during delay and trace eyeblink conditioning.

Bethany Plakke, John H Freeman, Amy Poremba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Retrosplenial cortex and aversive conditioning.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Micro-positron emission tomography imaging of rat brain metabolism during expression of contextual conditioning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bethany PlakkeUniversity of Iowa, Department of Psychology, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
John H Freeman
Amy Poremba
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Ontogeny of Eyeblink ConditioningR01NS038890 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI FREEMAN, JOHN H · 2000 to 2014
$3.2M
Neural Pathways for Conditioned Stimuli in Eyeblink ConditioningR01MH080005 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI FREEMAN, JOHN H · 2007 to 2014
$2.4M
Auditory Cortical Areas for Encoding and MemoryR01DC007156 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI POREMBA, AMY · 2007 to 2011
$1.8M
Neural Substrates of LearningR03MH066922 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI POREMBA, AMY · 2002 to 2002
$74k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007156NIMH NIH HHS MH080005NIMH NIH HHS MH66922NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080005NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH066922NINDS NIH HHS NS038890NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the essential neural circuitry for delay eyeblink conditioning has been largely identified, much of the neural circuitry for trace conditioning has yet to be determined. The major difference between delay and trace conditioning is a time gap between the presentation of the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) during trace conditioning. It is this time gap, which accounts for the additional memory component and may require extra neural structures, including hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. A metabolic marker of energy use, radioactively labeled glucose analog, was used to compare differences in glucose analog uptake between delay, trace, and unpaired experimental groups (rats, Long-Evans), to identify possible new areas of involvement within forebrain and midbrain. Here, we identify increased 2-DG uptake for the delay group compared to the unpaired group in various areas including: the medial geniculate nuclei (MGN), the amygdala, cingulate cortex, auditory cortex, medial dorsal thalamus, and frontal cortices. For the trace group, compared to the unpaired group, there was an increase in 2-DG uptake for the medial orbital frontal cortex and the medial MGN. The trace group also exhibited more increases lateralized to the right hemisphere, opposite to the side of US delivery, in various areas including: CA1, subiculum, presubiculum, perirhinal cortex, ventral and dorsal MGN, and the basolateral and central amygdala. While some of these areas have been identified as important for delay or trace conditioning, some new structures have been identified such as the orbital frontal cortex for both delay and trace groups.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAutoradiographyBrain MappingCarbon RadioisotopesConditioning, EyelidDeoxyglucoseFunctional LateralityGlucoseMaleMesencephalonProsencephalonRatsRats, Long-EvansTime FactorsCarbon RadioisotopesDeoxyglucoseGlucose

Identifiers

PMID19376256
PMCPMC3630995
OpenAlexW2025472912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.