Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19376197›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience2009

Insights into brain development from neurogenetic syndromes: evidence from fragile X syndrome, Williams syndrome, Turner syndrome and velocardiofacial syndrome.

E Walter, P K Mazaika, A L Reiss

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Reprint of: Mapping connectivity in the developing brain.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Mapping connectivity in the developing brain.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors.Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.) · 2011
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E WalterCenter for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. ewalter@stanford.edu
P K Mazaika
A L Reiss

Funding

Williams Syndrome: The Molecular Genetic CharacterizationP01HD033113 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BELLUGI, URSULA · 1996 to 2015
$19.4M
NEUROPSYCHIATRIC-MOLECULAR ASSOCIATIONS IN FRAGILE X SYNR01MH050047 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 1993 to 2022
$12.5M
TRAINING FOR CHILD PSYCHIATRY AND CHILD DEVELOPMENTT32MH019908 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI IAN H GOTLIB, DAVID S HONG · 1993 to 2026
$6.3M
Gene, Brain and Behavior in Turner SyndromeR01HD049653 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI REISS, ALLAN L · 2006 to 2016
$6.0M
Improved Methods for Single Subject FMRI Analysis for Clinical ApplicationK25MH077309 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MAZAIKA, PAUL K · 2006 to 2010
$807k
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD033113NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049653NIMH NIH HHS K25 MH077309NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH050047NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019908NIMH NIH HHS T32-MH19908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few decades, behavioral, neuroimaging and molecular studies of neurogenetic conditions, such as Williams, fragile X, Turner and velocardiofacial (22q11.2 deletion) syndromes, have led to important insights regarding brain development. These investigations allow researchers to examine "experiments of nature" in which the deletion or alteration of one gene or a contiguous set of genes can be linked to aberrant brain structure or function. Converging evidence across multiple imaging modalities has now begun to highlight the abnormal neural circuitry characterizing many individual neurogenetic syndromes. Furthermore, there has been renewed interest in combining analyses across neurogenetic conditions in order to search for common organizing principles in development. In this review, we highlight converging evidence across syndromes from multiple neuroimaging modalities, with a particular emphasis on functional imaging. In addition, we discuss the commonalities and differences pertaining to selective deficits in visuospatial processing that occur across four neurogenetic syndromes. We suggest avenues for future exploration, with the goal of achieving a deeper understanding of the neural abnormalities in these affected populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDiGeorge SyndromeFragile X SyndromeHumansModels, NeurologicalSpace PerceptionTurner SyndromeVisual PerceptionWilliams Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID19376197
PMCPMC2795482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.