Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19374462›Full record

Trial reportCNS drugs2009

Efficacy of topiramate in adult patients with symptomatic epilepsy: an open-label, long-term, retrospective observation.

Yang Lu, Weihua Yu, Xuefeng Wang

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Antiepileptic drugs for treating seizures in adults with brain tumours.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang LuThe First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Weihua Yu
Xuefeng Wang
First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNChongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTopiramate is a newer generation antiepileptic drug with a wide range of antiepileptic efficacy as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy, and which has shown positive activity in intractable epilepsy and newly diagnosed epilepsy. Topiramate has also been shown to exert good seizure control with a low incidence of adverse effects in brain tumour-associated epilepsy. However, there have been few reports on the efficacy of topiramate in the treatment of symptomatic epilepsy of varying aetiologies.

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of topiramate in the treatment of adult patients with symptomatic epilepsy of various aetiologies.

methodsThis was an open-label, long-term, retrospective observation. 227 patients with symptomatic epilepsy (110 male, 117 female) were enrolled into this study. The underlying aetiologies included low-grade brain tumour, head trauma, cerebrovascular diseases, infection, diabetes mellitus, hydrocephalus and parasitosis. Topiramate was titrated up to a target dosage of 200 mg/day and maintained for at least 1 year. Response to topiramate was defined as > or = 50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline. Seizure free was defined as no seizure occurring during 1 year of topiramate therapy.

results157 (69.2%) patients were responders and 124 (54.6%) patients were seizure free with topiramate administration. Responders by subgroup included 40 patients (74.0%) with low-grade brain tumour, 32 (55.2%) with trauma, 30 (90.9%) with cerebrovascular disease, 21 (55.3%) with infection, 18 (81.8%) with diabetes, 12 (85.7%) with parasitosis and 4 (50.0%) with hydrocephalus. The percentage of seizure-free patients by subgroup was 61.0% with brain tumours, 31.0% with trauma, 78.8% with cerebrovascular disease, 44.7% with infection, 59.0% with diabetes, 85.7% with parasitosis and 50.0% with hydrocephalus. The incidence of adverse effects was 36.1%. The most commonly reported adverse effects were weight loss, memory impairments, paraesthesia, headache and dizziness; most were mild to moderate in severity and transient. Sixty-eight (30.0%) patients withdrew from topiramate treatment in this study: topiramate was discontinued in 56 patients because of lack of efficacy and in 12 patients because of adverse effects. At the end of the study, 109 patients received topiramate monotherapy, including 52 newly diagnosed patients and 57 subjects who transferred to topiramate monotherapy successfully; another 118 patients received add-on topiramate therapy. The percentage of patients responding to topiramate was 85.3% in the monotherapy group and 54.2% in the topiramate add-on therapy group; the percentage of seizure-free patients was 68.8% in the topiramate monotherapy group and 41.5% in the topiramate add-on therapy group.

conclusionWhen administered either as a single drug or as an add-on drug, topiramate is effective and well tolerated in adult patients with symptomatic epilepsy of various aetiologies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntiemeticsDrug Therapy, CombinationEpilepsy, GeneralizedFemaleFructoseHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedObservationOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesTopiramateAntiemeticsFructoseTopiramate

Identifiers

PMID19374462
OpenAlexW75629869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.