Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19373520›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental nephrology2009

Current status and issues of C1q nephropathy.

Akiko Mii, Akira Shimizu, Yukinari Masuda, Emiko Fujita, Kaoru Aki, Masamichi Ishizaki, Shigeru Sato, Adam Griesemer, Yuh Fukuda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. C1q nephropathy in children: clinical characteristics and outcome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2014
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Akiko MiiDepartment of Analytic Human Pathology, Nippon Medical School, 1-25-2 Nezu, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0031, Japan.
Akira ShimizuDepartment of Analytic Human Pathology, Nippon Medical School, 1-25-2 Nezu, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0031, Japan. ashimizu@nms.ac.jp.
Yukinari MasudaDepartment of Analytic Human Pathology, Nippon Medical School, 1-25-2 Nezu, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0031, Japan.
Emiko FujitaDepartment of Analytic Human Pathology, Nippon Medical School, 1-25-2 Nezu, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0031, Japan.
Kaoru AkiDepartment of Analytic Human Pathology, Nippon Medical School, 1-25-2 Nezu, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0031, Japan.
Masamichi IshizakiDepartment of Analytic Human Pathology, Nippon Medical School, 1-25-2 Nezu, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0031, Japan.
Shigeru SatoCentral Institute for Electron Microscopic Researches, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Adam GriesemerTransplantation Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Yuh FukudaDepartment of Analytic Human Pathology, Nippon Medical School, 1-25-2 Nezu, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0031, Japan.
Nippon Medical School · JPHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C1q nephropathy, first proposed by Jennette and Hipp [Am J Clin Pathol 83:415-420, 1985; Am J Kidney Dis 6:103-110, 1985], was described as a distinct glomerular disease entity characterized by extensive mesangial deposition of C1q, with associated mesangial immune complexes, and the absence of any clinical and laboratory evidence of systemic lupus erythematosus. Now, 20 years since the first report, the disease entity is gradually attaining recognition, particularly in the field of pediatrics. C1q is the subcomponent of C1 in the classical pathway of complement activation. Generally, C1q deposition is caused by the activation of C1 by immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM; therefore, C1q nephropathy is considered as an immune complex glomerulonephritis. However, in C1q nephropathy, it remains unclear whether the deposition of C1q in the glomeruli is in response to the deposition of immunoglobulin or immune complex, or whether deposition is non-specific trapping that accompanies increased glomerular protein trafficking associated with proteinuria. Since not only the pathogenesis of C1q deposition in glomeruli but also its significance are still uncertain, it has not yet been established as an independent disease. From recent publications of the clinical and pathological characterizations, C1q nephropathy has been thought to be a subgroup of primary focal segmental glomerular sclerosis. However, many reports describe different symptoms, histopathologies, therapeutic responses and prognoses, suggesting that C1q nephropathy is not a single disease entity, but that it may be a combination of several disease groups. There are many uncertain areas requiring further investigation, though it is hoped that a detailed examination of future cases will clarify the subgroups making up C1q nephropathy and their clinicopathological characteristics, and will lead to the establishment of C1q nephropathy as an independent disease entity.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolComplement C1qDisease ProgressionEvidence-Based MedicineGlomerulonephritisHumansInfantKidney GlomerulusProteinuriaRisk FactorsTerminology as TopicYoung AdultComplement C1q

Identifiers

PMID19373520
OpenAlexW2090996257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.