ArticleCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2008
Implications of gender and pregnancy for antiretroviral drug dosing.
Article in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tenofovir rescue therapy in pregnant females with chronic hepatitis B.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Obstetric Pharmacokinetic Dosing Studies are Urgently Needed.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2014Review
- Adherence with drug therapy in pregnancy.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review briefly outlines the influences of gender and pregnancy on drug disposition, and describes the available antiretroviral pharmacokinetic data and dosing recommendations in these groups. RECENT
findingsRecent studies in pregnant women continue to document altered exposure of different classes of drugs during pregnancy. While new information shows that tenofovir exposure is significantly decreased during pregnancy, the magnitude of the decrease will not likely necessitate dose changes, similar to other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. In contrast, standard doses of lopinavir/ritonavir in the third trimester showed markedly decreased exposure, and higher doses of this co-formulated agent should be given to women during the third trimester. Likewise, nelfinavir exposure using the new 625-mg tablets is also decreased during pregnancy, and higher doses should be considered in the third trimester. SUMMARY: The majority of antiretrovirals studied have altered pharmacokinetics during pregnancy. Understanding the extent of these changes is necessary to recommend dose changes during pregnancy when appropriate. The correct dose is critical to maintain efficacy and safety of these agents for both the mother and the fetus. Innovative study designs are needed to facilitate the study of antiretrovirals during pregnancy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.