Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19372573›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2009

The Wisconsin Predicting Patients' Relapse questionnaire.

Daniel M Bolt, Megan E Piper, Danielle E McCarthy, Sandra J Japuntich, Michael C Fiore, Stevens S Smith, Timothy B Baker

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Electronically Monitored Nicotine Gum Use Before and After Smoking Lapses: Relationship With Lapse and Relapse.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  2. Predictors of Smoking Cessation Attempts and Success Following Motivation-Phase Interventions Among People Initially Unwilling to Quit Smoking.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Anhedonia: Its Dynamic Relations With Craving, Negative Affect, and Treatment During a Quit Smoking Attempt.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Quitline cessation counseling for young adult smokers: a randomized clinical trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2013
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Smoker characteristics and smoking-cessation milestones.American journal of preventive medicine · 2011
    Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Barriers to Building More Effective Treatments: Negative Interactions Amongst Smoking Intervention Components.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Using multidimensional item response theory to evaluate how response styles impact measurement.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel M BoltDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI 53711, USA.
Megan E Piper
Danielle E McCarthy
Sandra J Japuntich
Michael C Fiore
Stevens S Smith
Timothy B Baker

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (UW-Madison)KL2RR025012 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$11.1M
RELAPSE: LINKING SCIENCE AND PRACTICEP50CA084724 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI FIORE, MICHAEL C · 1999 to 2003
$8.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA84724NCI NIH HHS P50 CA084724NCRR NIH HHS 1KL2-RR025012-01NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRelapse is the most common smoking cessation outcome. Accurate prediction of relapse likelihood could be an important clinical tool used to influence treatment selection or duration. The aim of this research was to develop a brief clinical relapse proneness questionnaire to be used with smokers interested in quitting in a clinical setting where time is at a premium.

methodsDiverse items assessing constructs shown in previous research to be related to relapse risk, such as nicotine dependence and self-efficacy, were evaluated to determine their independent contributions to relapse prediction. In an exploratory dataset, candidate items were assessed among smokers motivated to quit smoking who enrolled in one of three randomized controlled smoking cessation trials. A cross-validation dataset was used to compare the relative predictive power of the new instrument against the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) at 1-week, 8-week, and 6-month postquit assessments.

resultsWe selected seven items with relatively nonoverlapping content for the Wisconsin Predicting Patient's Relapse (WI-PREPARE) measure, a brief, seven-item questionnaire that taps physical dependence, environmental factors, and individual difference characteristics. Cross-validation analyses suggested that the WI-PREPARE demonstrated a stronger prediction of relapse at 1-week and 8-week postquit assessments than the FTND and comparable prediction to the FTND at a 6-month postquit assessment. DISCUSSION: The WI-PREPARE is easy to score, suggests the nature of a patient's relapse risk, and predicts short- and medium-term relapse better than the FTND.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMalePlacebo EffectPredictive Value of TestsSecondary PreventionSmoking CessationWisconsin

Identifiers

PMID19372573
PMCPMC2671459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.