Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19370694›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Sulpiride versus placebo for schizophrenia.

Ichiro M Omori, Jijun Wang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Disconnection of drug-response and placebo-response in acute-phase antipsychotic drug trials on schizophrenia? Meta-regression analysis.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Sulpiride versus placebo for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Sulpiride augmentation for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ichiro M OmoriCochrane Schizophrenia Group, University of Nottingham, Institute of Mental Health, Gateway Building,, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, UK, NG7 2TU. ichiro.m.omori@gmail.com
Jijun Wang
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSulpiride is a relatively old antipsychotic drug reputed to have low incidence of adverse effects and an effect on the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. This relatively inexpensive antipsychotic drug has a similar neuropharmacological profile to several novel atypical drugs.

objectivesTo evaluate the effects of sulpiride for schizophrenia and other similar serious mental illnesses in comparison with placebo. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group Trials Register (September 2008) and references of all identified studies for further trial citations. We contacted pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials for additional information. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing sulpiride with placebo for people with schizophrenia and other types of schizophrenia-like psychoses. The primary outcome of interest was clinically significant response in global state. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We independently inspected citations and abstracts, ordered papers, re-inspected and quality assessed these. IMO and JW extracted data. We analysed dichotomous data using random-effects relative risk (RR) and estimated the 95% confidence interval (CI) around this. Where continuous data were included, we analysed this data using random-effects weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval. MAIN

resultsTwo trials of short duration compare sulpiride with placebo (total n=113). As regards mental state, there were no clear differences between groups for either positive or negative symptoms (n=18, 1 RCT, WMD Manchester scale negative subscore -0.30 CI -1.66 to 1.06; n=18, 1 RCT, WMD SANS 2.90 CI -0.14 to 5.94). Few people left these studies by three months (n=113, 2 RCTs, RR 1.00 CI 0.25 to 4.00). One subscore finding found sulpiride improved social behavior (n=18, 1 RCT, WMD -2.90 CI -5.60 to -0.20). There were no data for many important outcomes such as general functioning, service use or adverse effects. AUTHORS'

conclusionsSulpiride may be an effective antipsychotic drug but evidence of its superiority over placebo from randomised trials is very limited. Practice will have to use evidence from sources other than trials until better evidence is generated.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsHumansPlacebosRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchizophreniaSulpirideAntipsychotic AgentsPlacebosSulpiride

Identifiers

PMID19370694
OpenAlexW4236610876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.