Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19370688›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults.

Christopher Eccleston, Amanda C de C Williams, Stephen Morley

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 215 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Burning mouth syndrome.BMJ clinical evidence · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Cognitive behavioural therapies for fibromyalgia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher EcclestonCochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Review Group, Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, UK, BA2 7AY. c.eccleston@bath.ac.uk
Amanda C de C Williams
Stephen Morley
University College London · GBUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological treatments are designed to treat pain, distress and disability, and are in common practice. No comprehensive systematic review has been published since 1999.

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of psychological therapies on pain, disability, and mood. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of psychological therapy were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and Psychlit and CENTRAL from the beginning of each abstracting service until January 2008. A further search was undertaken from January 2008 to August 2008. Additional studies were identified from the reference lists of retrieved papers and from discussion with investigators. SELECTION CRITERIA: Full publications of RCTs of psychological treatments compared with an active treatment, waiting list or treatment as usual. Studies were excluded if the pain was primarily headache, or was associated with a malignant disease. Studies were also excluded if the number of patients in any treatment arm was less than 10. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Fifty-two studies were examined with a quality rating scale specifically designed for use with these studies. Data were extracted from 40 studies (4781 participants) by two authors. Two main classes of treatment (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Behaviour Therapy (BT)), were compared with two control conditions (Treatment as Usual (TAU) and Active control (AC)), at two assessment points (immediately following treatment and six months following treatment), giving eight comparisons. For each comparison, treatment effectiveness was assessed on three outcomes: pain, disability, and mood giving a total of 24 analyses. MAIN

resultsOverall there is an absence of evidence for BT, except for pain immediately following treatment compared with TAU. CBT has some small positive effects for pain, disability and mood. At present there is insufficient data on quality or content of treatment to investigate their influence on outcome. The quality of the trial design has improved over time but the quality of treatments has not. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCBT and BT have weak effects in improving pain. CBT and BT have minimal effects on disability associated with chronic pain. CBT and BT are effective in altering mood outcomes, and there is some evidence that these changes are maintained at six months.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementAdultAffectBehavior TherapyChronic DiseaseCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansPainRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID19370688
OpenAlexW4233277268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.