Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19370686›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Huperzine A for vascular dementia.

Zilong Hao, Ming Liu, Zhiqin Liu, Donghao Lv

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cerebrolysin for vascular dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Traditional Chinese herbal medicine for vascular dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Vascular cognitive impairment: disease mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Treatments with Traditional Chinese Medicine.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2016
    Review
  14. Herbal Medicine for the Treatment of Vascular Dementia: An Overview of Scientific Evidence.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2016
    Review
  15. Huperzine a in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia: a meta-analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zilong HaoDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China, 610041.
Ming Liu
Zhiqin Liu
Donghao Lv
West China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNSichuan University · CNXian Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuperzine A, a form of herbal medicine, has been considered as an alternative treatment for vascular dementia (VaD) in China.

objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of Huperzine A in patients with vascular dementia. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group (CDCIG) was searched on 7 July 2008 using the terms: huperzi* OR ayapin OR scoparon*. The CDCIG Specialized Register contains records from all major health care databases (The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS) as well as from many trials databases and grey literature sources. The review authors searched the following databases in August 2008 using the terms 'Huperzine A', 'Shishanjianjia', 'Haboyin' and 'Shuangyiping': The Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1977 to August 2008); Chinese Science and Technique Journals Database (VIP) (1989 to August 2008); China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (1979 to August 2008); The Chinese Clinical Trials Register (ChiCTR, August 2008); Google (August 2008). In addition, the review authors searched reference lists, relevant clinical trials and contacted researchers in an effort to identify further published and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing Huperzine A with placebo in patients with vascular dementia were considered eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. MAIN

resultsOnly one small trial, involving 14 participants, was included. No significant beneficial effect of Huperzine A on the improvement of cognitive function measured by MMSE for VaD (WMD 2.40; 95% CI -4.78 to 9.58) was observed. No death from all causes at the end of treatment were reported. At present, other outcome measures were not available in any of the trials. Although no statistically significant differences were found between the Huperzine A-treated and control groups, the confidence intervals for the treatment effect estimates were wide and included both clinically significant benefits and clinically significant harms. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is no [convincing] evidence that Huperzine A is of value in vascular dementia based on one small trial. It deserves further research.

Indexed as

AlkaloidsDementia, VascularDrugs, Chinese HerbalHumansNeuroprotective AgentsSesquiterpenesAlkaloidsDrugs, Chinese Herbalhuperzine ANeuroprotective AgentsSesquiterpenes

Identifiers

PMID19370686
PMCPMC4171119
OpenAlexW1539171929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.