Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19370649›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Pain control in first trimester surgical abortion.

Regina-Maria Renner, Jeffrey T J Jensen, Mark D N Nichols, Alison Edelman

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01094366 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

An Evaluation of the Paracervical Block for Pain Control in First Trimester Surgical Abortion

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2010 to 2012Enrolled121ConditionsLegal Abortion With Complication, PainArmsParacervical Block, Sham Paracervical Block
NCT01330459 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

An Evaluation of Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen for Pain Control in First Trimester Surgical Abortion

TypeinterventionalSponsorElizabeth MicksRan2011 to 2011Enrolled121ConditionsPainArmsHydrocodone/acetaminophen, Placebo, Ibuprofen, Lorazepam, Lidocaine
NCT02219308 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Pain Control for Intrauterine Device Placement: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Paracervical Block

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2014 to 2017Enrolled67ConditionsPain Due to Intrauterine Contraceptive DeviceArmsParacervical Block (PCB), No Paracervical Block (Sham PCB)
NCT03636451 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Assessing the Effect of Paracervical Block Volume on Pain Control for Dilation and Curettage: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2018 to 2022Enrolled114ConditionsAbortion, Spontaneous, Abortion in First Trimester, Pain Uterus, Abortion EarlyArms40cc buffered 0.5% lidocaine with 2 units of vasopressin paracervical block, 20cc 1% lidocaine with 2 units of vasopressin paracervical block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Local anaesthesia for pain control in first trimester surgical abortion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Anaesthesia for evacuation of incomplete miscarriage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. First-trimester surgical abortion practice in Canada in 2012.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Hypnoanalgesia for Dilatation and Curettage Pain Control.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Regina-Maria RennerDept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Street, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA. rennerr@ohsu.edu
Jeffrey T J Jensen
Mark D N Nichols
Alison Edelman
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirst trimester abortions especially cervical dilation and suction aspiration are associated with pain, despite various methods of pain control.

objectivesCompare different methods of pain control during first trimester surgical abortion. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched multiple electronic databases with the appropriate key words, as well as reference lists of articles, and contacted professionals to seek other trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing methods of pain control in first trimester surgical abortion at less than 14 weeks gestational age using electric or manual suction aspiration. Outcomes included intra- and postoperative pain, side effects, recovery measures and satisfaction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data. Meta-analysis results are expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) or Peto Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI). MAIN

resultsWe included forty studies with 5131 participants. Due to heterogeneity we divided studies into 7 groups:Local anesthesia: Data was insufficient to show a clear benefit of a paracervical block (PCB) compared to no PCB or a PCB with bacteriostatic saline. Pain scores during dilation and aspiration were improved with deep injection (WMD -1.64 95% CI -3.21 to -0.08; WMD 1.00 95% CI 1.09 to 0.91), and with adding a 4% intrauterine lidocaine infusion (WMD -2.0 95% CI -3.29 to -0.71, WMD -2.8 95% CI -3.95 to -1.65 with dilation and aspiration respectively).PCB with premedication: Ibuprofen and naproxen resulted in small reduction of intra- and post-operative pain.Analgesia: Diclofenac-sodium did not reduce pain.Conscious sedation: The addition of conscious intravenous sedation using diazepam and fentanyl to PCB decreased procedural pain.General anesthesia (GA): Conscious sedation increased intraoperative but decreased postoperative pain compared to GA (Peto OR 14.77 95% CI 4.91 to 44.38, and Peto OR 7.47 95% CI 2.2 to 25.36 for dilation and aspiration respectively, and WMD 1.00 95% CI 1.77 to 0.23 postoperatively). Inhalation anesthetics are associated with increased blood loss (p<0.001).GA with premedication: The COX 2 inhibitor etoricoxib, the non-selective COX inhibitors lornoxicam, diclofenac and ketorolac IM, and the opioid nalbuphine were improved postoperative pain.Non-pharmacological intervention: Listening to music decreased procedural pain.No major complication was observed. AUTHORS'

conclusionsConscious sedation, GA and some non-pharmacological interventions decreased procedural and postoperative pain, while being safe and satisfactory to patients. Data on the widely used PCB is inadequate to support its use, and it needs to be further studied to determine any benefit.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAnalgesiaAnesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, LocalAnesthesia, ObstetricalFemaleHumansHypnosis, AnestheticMusic TherapyNerve BlockPostoperative PainPregnancyPremedicationProcedural SedationRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID19370649
PMCPMC7390061
OpenAlexW1596272029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.