SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Recruitment manoeuvres for adults with acute lung injury receiving mechanical ventilation.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Recruitment manoeuvres for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving mechanical ventilation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Lung ventilation strategies for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- A randomised controlled trial of an open lung strategy with staircase recruitment, titrated PEEP and targeted low airway pressures in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Critical care (London, England) · 2011Trial
- Spanish experience on the efficacy of airways clearance techniques in SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) at intensive care unit: An editorial and case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2022Article
- Effects of Stepwise Lung Recruitment Maneuvers in Patients with Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
- Sepsis: A Review of Advances in Management.Advances in therapy · 2017Review
- Clinical Practice Guideline of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2016Review
- Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Intractable Pulmonary Insufficiency: Practical Issues and Future Directions.BioMed research international · 2016Review
- Alveolar instability (atelectrauma) is not identified by arterial oxygenation predisposing the development of an occult ventilator-induced lung injury.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2015Article
- What is new in refractory hypoxemia?Intensive care medicine · 2013Article
- Clinical review: Acute respiratory distress syndrome - clinical ventilator management and adjunct therapy.Critical care (London, England) · 2013Review
- Comparison of recruitment manoeuvres in ventilated sheep with acute respiratory distress syndrome.Lung · 2013Article
- Recruitment manoeuvres in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Little evidence for routine use.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2013Review
- Ventilation with "clinically relevant" high tidal volumes does not promote stretch-induced injury in the lungs of healthy mice.Critical care medicine · 2012Article
- Acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome in the injured patient.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2012Review
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome: pathophysiology and therapeutic options.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2012Article
- Goal-directed mechanical ventilation: are we aiming at the right goals? A proposal for an alternative approach aiming at optimal lung compliance, guided by esophageal pressure in acute respiratory failure.Critical care research and practice · 2012Article
- Efficacy and safety of recruitment maneuvers in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Annals of intensive care · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecruitment manoeuvres are often used to treat patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but the effect of this treatment on clinical outcomes has not been well established.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to examine recruitment manoeuvres compared to standard care as therapy for adults with acute lung injury in order to quantify the effects on patient outcomes (mortality, length of ventilation, and other relevant outcomes). SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 2); MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2008); EMBASE (January 1980 to May 2008); LILACS (1982 to May 2008); CINAHL (1982 to May 2008); and Current Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials of adults who were mechanically ventilated comparing recruitment manoeuvres to standard care for those patients diagnosed with ALI or ARDS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. MAIN
resultsSeven trials met the inclusion criteria for this review (the total number of included participants was 1170). All trials included a recruitment manoeuvre as part of the treatment strategy for patients on mechanical ventilation for ARDS or ALI. However, two of the trials included a package of ventilation that was different from the control ventilation in aspects other than the recruitment manoeuvre. The intervention group showed no significant difference on 28-day mortality (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.17, P = 0.2). Similarly there was no statistical difference for risk of barotrauma (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.07 to 3.52, P = 0.5) or blood pressure (MD 0.9 mm Hg, 95% CI -4.28 to 6.08, P = 0.73). Recruitment manoeuvres significantly increased oxygenation above baseline levels for a short period of time in four of the five studies that measured oxygenation. There were insufficient data on length of ventilation or hospital stay to pool results. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is not evidence to make conclusions on whether recruitment manoeuvres reduce mortality or length of ventilation in patients with ALI or ARDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19370647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.