Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19370644›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Oral contraceptives containing drospirenone for premenstrual syndrome.

Laureen M Lopez, Ad A Kaptein, Frans M Helmerhorst

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01482338 (A Comparative Efficacy of Low-dose Combine Oral Contraceptives Containing Desogestrel 150 mg and Drospirenone 3 mg on Premenstrual Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01482338 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Efficacy of Low-dose Combine Oral Contraceptives Containing Desogestrel 150 mg and Drospirenone 3 mg on Premenstrual Symptoms

TypeinterventionalSponsorChulalongkorn UniversityRan2011 to 2012Enrolled90ConditionsPremenstrual SyndromeArmsEE 20 microgram with desogestrel 150 mg, EE 20 microgram with drospirenone 3 mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Premenstrual syndrome, a common but underrated entity: review of the clinical literatureJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Is premenstrual dysphoric disorder really a disorder?Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2015
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ISPMD consensus on the management of premenstrual disorders.Archives of women's mental health · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Recent advances in hormonal contraception.F1000 medicine reports · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laureen M LopezBehavioral and Biomedical Research, Family Health International, P.O. Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA. llopez@fhi.org
Ad A Kaptein
Frans M Helmerhorst
Family Health International 360 · USLeiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPremenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a common problem. Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a severe form of PMS. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs), which have both progestin and estrogen, have been examined for their ability to relieve premenstrual symptoms. A COC containing drospirenone and low estrogen has been approved for treating PMDD in women who choose COCs for contraception.

objectivesTo review all randomized controlled trials comparing combined oral contraceptives containing drospirenone versus a placebo or another COC for effect on premenstrual symptoms. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the computerized databases MEDLINE, POPLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, LILACS, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for studies of drospirenone and premenstrual syndrome. We also examined references lists of relevant articles, and wrote to known investigators to find other trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials in any language that compared a COC containing drospirenone versus a placebo or another COC for effect on premenstrual symptoms. Primary outcome was the prospective recording of premenstrual symptoms (affective and physical). Adverse events related to COC use were examined. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently abstracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN

resultsWe included five trials with a total of 1600 women. Two placebo-controlled trials of women with PMDD showed less severe premenstrual symptoms after three months with drospirenone (plus ethinyl estradiol (EE) 20g) than with the placebo (WMD -7.83; 95% CI -10.91 to -4.75). The drospirenone group had greater decreases in impairment of productivity (WMD -0.42; 95% CI -0.64 to -0.20), social activities (WMD -0.39; 95% CI -0.62 to -0.15), and relationships (WMD -0.38; 95% CI -0.61 to -0.51). Side effects more common with COC use were nausea, intermenstrual bleeding, and breast pain. Little effect was found on less severe symptoms when comparing drospirenone plus more estrogen to another COC. A six-month study showed fewer symptoms with drospirenone, while a two-year trial found the groups to be similar. AUTHORS'

conclusionsDrospirenone plus EE 20 mug may help treat premenstrual symptoms in women with PMDD. The placebo also had a large effect. We do not know whether the COC works after three cycles, for women with less severe symptoms, or better than other COCs. Larger and longer trials of higher quality are needed to address these issues. Trials should follow CONSORT reporting guidelines.

Indexed as

AndrostenesContraceptives, Oral, CombinedFemaleHumansPremenstrual SyndromeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAndrostenesContraceptives, Oral, Combineddrospirenone

Identifiers

PMID19370644
OpenAlexW4239706265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.