SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Sertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 304 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmacological and psychosocial interventions for night eating syndrome in adults.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Paroxetine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- 'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus treatment as usual for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- 'Third wave' cognitive and behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Behavioural therapies versus other psychological therapies for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Citalopram versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Fluvoxamine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Milnacipran versus other antidepressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Trial
- Cognitive improvement following treatment in late-life depression: relationship to vascular risk and age of onset.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2012Trial
- Complementary use of tai chi chih augments escitalopram treatment of geriatric depression: a randomized controlled trial.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2011Trial
- Strategic use of new generation antidepressants for depression: SUN(^_^)D study protocol.Trials · 2011Trial
- Improving depression and enhancing resilience in family dementia caregivers: a pilot randomized placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2010Trial
- Unveiling the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Antidepressants: A Systematic Review of Human Studies over the Last Decade.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Uncovering antidepressant prescription patterns: a three-year analysis of outpatient trends.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Sertraline-Induced Urine Incontinence.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2025Article
- A pooled analysis of the efficacy of sertraline in women, with a focus on those of childbearing age.Annals of general psychiatry · 2024Article
- Antidepressants and type 2 diabetes: highways to knowns and unknowns.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence clinical practice guideline on the treatment of depressive disorder recommended that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors should be the first-line option when drug therapy is indicated for a depressive episode. Preliminary evidence suggested that sertraline might be slightly superior in terms of effectiveness.
objectivesTo assess the evidence for the efficacy, acceptability and tolerability of escitalopram in comparison with tricyclics (TCAs), heterocyclics, other SSRIs and newer agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE (1966 to 2008), EMBASE (1974 to 2008), the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to July 2008. No language restriction was applied. Reference lists of relevant papers and previous systematic reviews were hand-searched. Pharmaceutical companies and experts in this field were contacted for supplemental data. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials allocating patients with major depression to sertraline versus any other antidepressive agent. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data. Discrepancies were resolved with another member of the team. A double-entry procedure was employed by two reviewers. Information extracted included study characteristics, participant characteristics, intervention details and outcome measures in terms of efficacy (the number of patients who responded or remitted), acceptability (the number of patients who failed to complete the study) and tolerability (side-effects). MAIN
resultsA total of 59 studies, mostly of low quality, were included in the review, involving multiple treatment comparisons between sertraline and other antidepressant agents. Evidence favouring sertraline over some other antidepressants for the acute phase treatment of major depression was found, either in terms of efficacy (fluoxetine) or acceptability/tolerability (amitriptyline, imipramine, paroxetine and mirtazapine). However, some differences favouring newer antidepressants in terms of efficacy (mirtazapine) and acceptability (bupropion) were also found. In terms of individual side effects, sertraline was generally associated with a higher rate of participants experiencing diarrhoea. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis highlighted a trend in favour of sertraline over other antidepressive agents both in terms of efficacy and acceptability, using 95% confidence intervals and a conservative approach, with a random effects analysis. However, the included studies did not report on all the outcomes that were pre-specified in the protocol of this review. Outcomes of clear relevance to patients and clinicians were not reported in any of the included studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.