Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19370591›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour.

Annemarie Lawrence, Lucy Lewis, G Justus Hofmeyr, Therese Dowswell, Cathy Styles

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05175599 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Hospital Waterbirth: A Pilot Randomized Control Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2022 to 2023Enrolled186ConditionsPregnancy RelatedArmsWater Birth
NCT06355453 completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Goldcrest Patch Performance

TypeobservationalSponsorGE HealthcareRan2024 to 2025Enrolled38ConditionsFetal MonitoringArmsGoldcrest Patch and Three Patch Coupons, Goldcrest Patch and Novii Patch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  6. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain relief in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hypnotherapy in management of delivery pain: a review.European journal of translational myology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Factors promoting or inhibiting normal birth.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Annemarie LawrenceInstitute of Women's and Children's Health (15), Townsville Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Drive, Douglas, Queensland, Australia, 4810. annemarie_lawrence@health.qld.gov.au
Lucy Lewis
G Justus Hofmeyr
Therese Dowswell
Cathy Styles
Townsville Hospital · AUUniversity of Fort Hare · ZAUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

Department of Health CPGS02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is more common for women in the developed world, and those in low-income countries giving birth in health facilities, to labour in bed. There is no evidence that this is associated with any advantage for women or babies, although it may be more convenient for staff. Observational studies have suggested that if women lie on their backs during labour this may have adverse effects on uterine contractions and impede progress in labour.

objectivesThe purpose of the review is to assess the effects of encouraging women to assume different upright positions (including walking, sitting, standing and kneeling) versus recumbent positions (supine, semi-recumbent and lateral) for women in the first stage of labour on length of labour, type of delivery and other important outcomes for mothers and babies. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (November 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing women randomised to upright versus recumbent positions in the first stage of labour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions for carrying out data collection, assessing study quality and analysing results. A minimum of two review authors independently assessed each study. MAIN

resultsThe review includes 21 studies with a total of 3706 women. Overall, the first stage of labour was approximately one hour shorter for women randomised to upright as opposed to recumbent positions (MD -0.99, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.39). Women randomised to upright positions were less likely to have epidural analgesia (RR 0.83 95% CI 0.72 to 0.96).There were no differences between groups for other outcomes including length of the second stage of labour, mode of delivery, or other outcomes related to the wellbeing of mothers and babies. For women who had epidural analgesia there were no differences between those randomised to upright versus recumbent positions for any of the outcomes examined in the review. Little information on maternal satisfaction was collected, and none of the studies compared different upright or recumbent positions. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is evidence that walking and upright positions in the first stage of labour reduce the length of labour and do not seem to be associated with increased intervention or negative effects on mothers' and babies' wellbeing. Women should be encouraged to take up whatever position they find most comfortable in the first stage of labour.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansLabor Stage, FirstPosturePregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSupine PositionTime FactorsWalking

Identifiers

PMID19370591
PMCPMC4164173
OpenAlexW2753061556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.