SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hospital Waterbirth: A Pilot Randomized Control Study
Evaluation of the Goldcrest Patch Performance
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of the peanut ball during labour: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Nursing open · 2021Pooled it
- Paracetamol/acetaminophen (single administration) for perineal pain in the early postpartum period.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Position in the second stage of labour for women with epidural anaesthesia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Parenteral opioids for maternal pain relief in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Accelerating newborn survival in Ghana through a low-dose, high-frequency health worker training approach: a cluster randomized trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018Trial
- Comparison of the Effects of Maternal Supportive Care and Acupressure (at BL32 Acupoint) on Labor Length and Infant's Apgar Score.Global journal of health science · 2015Trial
- Effect of dance labor on the management of active phase labor pain & clients' satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial study.Global journal of health science · 2014Trial
- Comparison of the effects of maternal supportive care and acupressure (BL32 acupoint) on pregnant women's pain intensity and delivery outcome.Journal of pregnancy · 2014Trial
- Alternative model of birth to reduce the risk of assisted vaginal delivery and perineal trauma.International urogynecology journal · 2012Trial
- Delivery in a vertical birth chair supported by freedom of movement during labor: A randomized control trial.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2023Article
- Effects of Obstetric Interventions During Labor on Birth Process and Newborn Health.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2021Article
- Hypnotherapy in management of delivery pain: a review.European journal of translational myology · 2019Article
- Birth ball for pregnant women in labour research protocol: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Article
- Influence of maternal exercise on fetal heart response during labor and delivery.Health science reports · 2018Article
- Uterine Monitoring Techniques from Patients' and Users' Perspectives.AJP reports · 2018Article
- Factors promoting or inhibiting normal birth.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2018Article
- "Five hundred years of medicine gone to waste"? Negotiating the implementation of an intercultural health policy in the Ecuadorian Andes.BMC public health · 2018Article
- Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil.Revista de saude publica · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIt is more common for women in the developed world, and those in low-income countries giving birth in health facilities, to labour in bed. There is no evidence that this is associated with any advantage for women or babies, although it may be more convenient for staff. Observational studies have suggested that if women lie on their backs during labour this may have adverse effects on uterine contractions and impede progress in labour.
objectivesThe purpose of the review is to assess the effects of encouraging women to assume different upright positions (including walking, sitting, standing and kneeling) versus recumbent positions (supine, semi-recumbent and lateral) for women in the first stage of labour on length of labour, type of delivery and other important outcomes for mothers and babies. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (November 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing women randomised to upright versus recumbent positions in the first stage of labour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used methods described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions for carrying out data collection, assessing study quality and analysing results. A minimum of two review authors independently assessed each study. MAIN
resultsThe review includes 21 studies with a total of 3706 women. Overall, the first stage of labour was approximately one hour shorter for women randomised to upright as opposed to recumbent positions (MD -0.99, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.39). Women randomised to upright positions were less likely to have epidural analgesia (RR 0.83 95% CI 0.72 to 0.96).There were no differences between groups for other outcomes including length of the second stage of labour, mode of delivery, or other outcomes related to the wellbeing of mothers and babies. For women who had epidural analgesia there were no differences between those randomised to upright versus recumbent positions for any of the outcomes examined in the review. Little information on maternal satisfaction was collected, and none of the studies compared different upright or recumbent positions. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is evidence that walking and upright positions in the first stage of labour reduce the length of labour and do not seem to be associated with increased intervention or negative effects on mothers' and babies' wellbeing. Women should be encouraged to take up whatever position they find most comfortable in the first stage of labour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.