SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2014Guideline
- Combination versus sequential single agent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Lapatinib for treatment of advanced or metastasized breast cancer: systematic review.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2009Pooled it
- Metronomic chemotherapy plus anti-PD-1 in metastatic breast cancer: a Bayesian adaptive randomized phase 2 trial.Nature medicine · 2024Trial
- Final Results of RIGHT Choice: Ribociclib Plus Endocrine Therapy Versus Combination Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Women With Clinically Aggressive Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Trial
- RESILIENCE: Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing Sorafenib With Capecitabine Versus Placebo With Capecitabine in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.Clinical breast cancer · 2017Trial
- Trial
- A randomized phase III study evaluating pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus capecitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of the PELICAN study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2017Trial
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer with pirarubicin versus epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide and docetaxel.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Trial
- A pooled analysis of gemcitabine plus docetaxel versus capecitabine plus docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer.The oncologist · 2014Trial
- Trial
- A prospective, controlled study of the botanical compound mixture LCS101 for chemotherapy-induced hematological complications in breast cancer.The oncologist · 2011Trial
- Patient expectations of outcome from systemic treatment for metastatic breast cancer.Ghana medical journal · 2026Article
- Combination Therapy, Drug Interactions, and Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Phase II Trials.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2026Article
- Real-World Practice Patterns in Diagnosis and First-Line Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer.The breast journal · 2026Article
- Lessons from oncology: Can cancer lead the way in resistance management?Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Treating ER-positive breast cancer: a review of the current FDA-approved SERMs and SERDs and their mechanisms of action.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial Peptides: Mechanisms, Applications, and Therapeutic Potential.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Review
- A novel approach for breast cancer treatment: the multifaceted antitumor effects of rMeV-Hu191.Hereditas · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCombination chemotherapy regimens are frequently favoured over single agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, in an attempt to achieve superior tumour response rates. It is not known however whether giving more intensive chemotherapy regimens results in better health outcomes, when both survival and toxicity are considered, and whether better response rates and rates of progression free survival actually translate to better overall survival.
objectivesTo compare single agent with combination chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register November 2008. Handsearching of recent conference proceedings was also undertaken. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of single agent chemotherapy compared to combination therapy in metastatic breast cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and quality, and extracted data. Hazard ratios were derived for reported time-to-event outcomes.Response rates were analysed as dichotomous variables. Toxicity and quality of life data were extracted where present. MAIN
resultsForty three eligible trials (48 comparisons) were identified. These included 9742 women, 55% of whom were receiving first-line treatment for metastatic disease. For overall survival there was a statistically significant difference in favour of the combination regimens with no heterogeneity (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.93, p<0.00001). Results were very similar when trials of first-line treatment were analysed, and for analyses where the single agent was also included in the combination regimen. Combination regimens showed a statistically significant advantage for survival over single agent taxane (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.75-0.89, p<0.00001), but not anthracycline (HR 0.94.86-1.02, p=0.15).Combination regimens were also associated with significantly better time to progression (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.74 - 0.82, p<0.00001) and response (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.14 -1.45, p<0.0001) although heterogeneity was statistically significant in both instances and probably due to clinical diversity of the participants and interventions.Women receiving combination regimens experienced a statistically significant detrimental effect on white cell count, increased alopecia and nausea and vomiting. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCombination chemotherapy regimens show a statistically significant advantage for survival, tumor response and time to progression in women with metastatic breast cancer but they also produce more toxicity. An unresolved question is whether combination regimens are more effective than single agents given sequentially.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.