SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Statins for the prevention of dementia.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alzheimer's disease in people with Down's syndrome: the prospects for and the challenges of developing preventative treatments.Journal of neurology · 2017Pooled it
- Statins for the prevention of dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Statins, cognition, and dementia—systematic review and methodological commentary.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2015Pooled it
- Do statins impair cognition? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Statins for the treatment of dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Brain cholesterol metabolism, oxysterols, and dementia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2013Pooled it
- Geographical variation in dementia: systematic review with meta-analysis.International journal of epidemiology · 2012Pooled it
- Mild cognitive impairment and dementia: the importance of modifiable risk factors.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011Pooled it
- Current and emerging drug treatment options for Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review.Drugs · 2011Pooled it
- Vascular cognitive impairment: disease mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2011Pooled it
- Treatment of cardiovascular risk factors to prevent cognitive decline and dementia: a systematic review.Vascular health and risk management · 2010Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Recent Advancements in Neuroimaging-Based Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Using Deep Learning Approaches in e-Health: A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Navigating the treatment landscape of Alzheimer's disease: Current strategies and future directions.Ibrain · 2025Review
- The role of statins in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: protective or not?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Statins Use in Alzheimer Disease: Bane or Boon from Frantic Search and Narrative Review.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Exploring the Genetic Associations Between the Use of Statins and Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2022Article
- Association of Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Statin Use With Risk of Dementia in Norway.JAMA network open · 2022Article
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2001. At that stage there was insufficient evidence to recommend statins for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The scope of this review has been expanded to include all forms of dementia.
objectivesTo assess the effects of statins in the prevention of dementia. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and LILACS were searched on 10 October 2007 using the terms statin*, lovastatin*, pravastatin*, simvastatin*, fluvastatin*, atorvastatin* and rosuvastatin*. The CDCIG Register contains records from many healthcare databases, SIGLE, LILACS as well as many trials databases and is updated regularly. SELECTION CRITERIA: Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials of statins in people at risk of AD and dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent reviewers extracted and assessed data independently and agreement was reached after discussion. Adverse effects were noted. MAIN
resultsTwo trials were identified with 26,340 participants; HPS 2002 and PROSPER 2002. Age range was 40-82 years across the two studies, PROSPER 2002 included 5804 patients aged 70-82 years and HPS included 20,536 patients with 5806 at least 70 years old at study entry. Mean total cholesterol 5.9 mmol/l, LDL cholesterol 3.4 mmol/l at study entry with mean reduction in LDL cholesterol of 1.0 mmol/l in simvastatin treated patients compared to placebo in HPS 2002. Mean total cholesterol 5.7 mmol/l, LDL cholesterol 3.8 mmol/l at study entry with mean reduction in LDL cholesterol of 1.02 mmol/l in pravastatin treated patients compared to placebo in PROSPER 2002. Mean follow-up 3.2 years in PROSPER, 5 years in HPS 2002. Cognition was measured at different times and with different scales so could not be combined in a meta-analysis. There was no difference in incidence of dementia in HPS 2002 (31 cases in simvastatin group, 31 cases in placebo group) nor in performance on the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status at final follow-up (23.7% simvastatin group cognitively impaired vs 24.2% in placebo group). There was no difference in cognition between groups either in relation to age at study entry or previous history of cerebrovascular disease. Cognitive function declined at the same rate in both treatment groups in PROSPER 2002, there was no significant difference between pravastatin treated and placebo groups in performance on letter digit codes, picture word learning test, Stroop and Mini Mental State Examination. There was no evidence that statins were detrimental to cognition. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is good evidence from RCTs that statins given in late life to individuals at risk of vascular disease have no effect in preventing AD or dementia. Biologically it seems feasible that statins could prevent dementia due to their role in cholesterol reduction and initial evidence from observational studies was very promising. Indication bias may have been a factor in these studies however and the evidence from subsequent RCTs has been negative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.