SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Oral contraceptive pill as treatment for primary dysmenorrhoea.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy and safety of acupuncture in women with primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Beta2-adrenoceptor agonists for dysmenorrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Impact of medical and surgical treatment of endometriosis on the cure of endometriosis and pain.BioMed research international · 2014Trial
- An innovative acupuncture treatment for primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized, crossover pilot study.Alternative therapies in health and medicineTrial
- Safety of individualized herbal medicine for dysmenorrhea: pharmacovigilance from South Korea's national pilot.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Holistic approach to dysmenorrhea management: Integrating pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for improved women's health in the Middle East and Africa.BMC women's health · 2025Review
- Characteristics of the menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptive use in elite Spanish basketball players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Effect of Curcumin on Dysmenorrhea and Symptoms of Premenstrual Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Korean journal of family medicine · 2024Article
- Comparative study of piroxicam and nitroglycerin on prostaglandin-modulated blood and electrolyte indices during di-estrous in female Wistar Rats.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2023Article
- Effect of Turmeric-Boswellia-Sesame Formulation in Menstrual Cramp Pain Associated with Primary Dysmenorrhea-A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Quantifying the Impact of Dysmenorrhea Symptoms on Quality-of-Life and Access to Oral Contraceptives by Income.Health psychology research · 2023Article
- Physical activity and combined hormonal contraception: association with female students' perception of menstrual symptoms.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Article
- The Establishment of a Mouse Model of Recurrent Primary Dysmenorrhea.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- A one-year observational cohort study of menstrual cramps and ovulation in healthy, normally ovulating women.Scientific reports · 2022Observational
- When the uterine mass is not a leiomyoma.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- The Use and Efficacy of Mobile Fertility-tracking Applications as a Method of Contraception: a Survey.Current obstetrics and gynecology reports · 2021Review
- Efficacy and safety of herbal medicine (Dangguijagyag-san) for primary dysmenorrhea: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center trial.Integrative medicine research · 2020Article
- The Effect of Micronutrients on Pain Management of Primary Dysmenorrhea: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of caring sciences · 2020Review
- Effect of Chinese herbal medicine on primary dysmenorrhea: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDysmenorrhoea (painful menstrual cramps) is common. Combined OCPs are recommended in the management of primary dysmenorrhoea.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness and safety of combined oral contraceptive pills for the management of primary dysmenorrhoea. SEARCH STRATEGY: We conducted electronic searches for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Register of controlled trials CENTRAL, CCTR, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (first conducted in 2001, updated on 5 November 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing all combined OCPs with other combined OCPs, placebo, no management, or management with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) were considered. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Twenty three studies were identified and ten were included. Six compared the combined OCP with placebo and four compared different dosages of combined OCP. MAIN
resultsOne study of low dose oestrogen and four studies of medium dose oestrogen combined OCPs compared with placebo, for a combined total of 497 women, reported pain improvement. For the outcome of pain relief across the different OCPs wthe pooled OR suggested benefit with OCPs compared to placebo (7 RCTs: Peto OR 2.01 [95% CI 1.32, 3.08]).The Chi-squared test for heterogeneity showed there is significant heterogeneity with an I(2) statistic of 64% and a significant chi-square test (14.06, df=5, p=0.02). A sensitivity analysis removing the studies with inadequate allocation concealment suggested significant benefit of treatment with the pooled OR of 2.99 (95% CI 1.76, 5.07) and hereterogeneity no longer statistically significant and I(2) statistic of 0%.Three studies reported adverse effects (Davis 2005; Hendrix 2002; GPRG 1968) The adverse effects were nausea, headaches and weight gain. Two studies reported if women experienced any side effect and no evidence of an effect was found (3 RCTs: OR = 1.45 (95% 0.71, 2.94). There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity.There were no studies identified that compated combined OCP versus non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. There was no evidence of a difference for the pooled studies for 3rd generation progestagens (OR = 1.11 (95% CI 0.79 - 1.57)). For the 2nd generation versus 3rd generation the OR was 0.44 (95% CI 0.23-0.84) suggesting benefit of the 3rd generation OCP but this was for a single study (Winkler 2003). AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is limited evidence for pain improvement with the use of the OCP (both low and medium dose oestrogen) in women with dysmenorrhoea. There is no evidence of a difference between different OCP preparations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.