Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19370568›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Nebulised hypertonic saline for cystic fibrosis.

Peter Wark, Vanessa M McDonald

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01952470 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Investigating the Role of Nebulised Mucolytic Therapy During Lower Respiratory Tract Infections Post Lung Transplantation.

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe AlfredRan2013 to 2017Enrolled32ConditionsLung Transplant Infection, Lower Respiratory Tract InfectionArmsDornase Alfa, Isotonic Saline.
NCT02834819 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Nebulized 3% Hypertonic Saline vs. Standard of Care in Patients With Bronchiolitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2013 to 2015Enrolled18ConditionsBronchiolitisArms3% Nebulized Hypertonic Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nebulised hypertonic saline for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Nebulised hypertonic saline for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Changing Face of Cystic Fibrosis and Its Implications for Screening.International journal of neonatal screening · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cystic Fibrosis.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Inhalation therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome.Annals of translational medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter WarkRespiratory Medicine HMRI, Level 3 John Hunter Hospital, Locked Bag 1 HRMC, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia, NSW 2310. peter.wark@hnehealth.nsw.gov.au
Vanessa M McDonald
John Hunter Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImpaired mucociliary clearance characterises lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF). Hypertonic saline (HS) enhances mucociliary clearance in vitro and may lessen the destructive inflammatory process in the airways.

objectivesTo investigate the effects of nebulised HS in CF compared to placebo or other treatments for mucociliary clearance. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane CF and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register, comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings.Most recent search: 31 July 2008. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled trials assessing HS compared to placebo or other mucolytic therapy, for any duration or dose regimen in people with CF (any age or disease severity). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently reviewed all identified trials and data; and assessed trial quality. MAIN

resultsTwelve trials (442 participants, aged 6 to 46 years) were included; five excluded and two await classification.In two placebo-controlled trials, HS (3% to 7%, 10 ml twice-a-day) significantly increased forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) at four weeks, mean difference (MD) 4.15 (95% CI 1.14 to 7.16); but not significantly after 48 weeks, MD 2.31 (95% CI -2.72 to 7.34). Two trials compared a similar dose of HS to recombinant deoxyribonuclease (RhDNAse). One three-week trial showed a non-significant difference, MD 1.60 (95% CI -7.96 to 11.16). However, in the second trial, after 12 weeks, RhDNAse led to a greater increase in FEV1 than HS (5 ml twice-daily), in participants with moderate to severe lung disease, MD 8.00 (95% CI 2.00 to 14.00).One 48-week placebo-controlled trial showed significant improvements in frequency of antibiotic use and quality of life; also that HS did not increase the concentration of Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus. AUTHORS'

conclusionsTreatment with 7% HS for 48 weeks showed a small improvement in FEV1 at four weeks; however, this was not sustained at 48 weeks (primary outcome measure of the only long-term trial). Unlike RhDNAse, HS can't, in the long term, be said to improve lung function. However, it did improve quality of life and reduce pulmonary exacerbations. Delivered following a bronchodilator, HS appears inexpensive and safe with no increased infection risk.We believe there is sufficient evidence to recommend using HS in CF; qualifying this we highlight that the only long-term trial failed to demonstrate a significant difference in its primary outcome (lung function) with improvements only in secondary outcomes.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationControlled Clinical Trials as TopicCystic FibrosisHumansMucociliary ClearanceNebulizers and VaporizersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSaline Solution, HypertonicSaline Solution, Hypertonic

Identifiers

PMID19370568
OpenAlexW1836313226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.