Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19370364›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2009

Forecasting the start of Quercus pollen season using several methods - the evaluation of their efficiency.

Idalia Kasprzyk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Aerobiology in the International Journal of Biometeorology, 1957-2017.International journal of biometeorology · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Poaceae pollen in the air depending on the thermal conditions.International journal of biometeorology · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Variations inAerobiologia · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Idalia KasprzykDepartment of Environmental Biology, University of Rzeszów,Rzeszów, Poland. idalia@univ.rzeszow.pl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forecasting the time when the atmospheric pollen season of allergenic plants begins is particularly important for doctors and their patients. The aim of this paper is to determine whether it is possible to forecast the start of the oak (Quercus) pollen season in Rzeszów, Poland. In the elaboration of the most effective model, various forecasting techniques were tested: growth degree days (GDD degrees C); meteorological factors; bioclimatic factors; and indicator taxon. The aerobiological monitoring was carried out in 1997-2005 and 2007 in Rzeszów (SE Poland). In the presented investigation, three methods defining the start of the Quercus pollen season were selected on the basis of accumulated sums of pollen or the constant occurrence of pollen grains in air. Despite the application of different combinations of GDD degrees C methods and threshold temperatures, the correlation coefficients between the expected and obtained values were low. In some cases, however, they proved highly effective for the test years (2005, 2007) with the accuracy of a few days. For GDD degrees C methods, the best threshold temperatures range between 5 and 6 degrees C. Models based on bioclimatic indices and meteorological variables were not satisfactory. On the basic of the 10 years of results, the method of indicator species were good for forecast the start of oak pollen season. Birch was the best indicator taxa.

Indexed as

ForecastingSeasonsAntigens, PlantAtmosphereComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalParticulate MatterPolandPollenQuercusAntigens, PlantParticulate Matter

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.