Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19369557›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2009

Specific and nonspecific plasticity of the primary auditory cortex elicited by thalamic auditory neurons.

Xiaofeng Ma, Nobuo Suga

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cortical mechanisms of spatial hearing.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  4. Adenosine AAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Discriminative auditory fear learning requires both tuned and nontuned auditory pathways to the amygdala.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2010
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaofeng MaDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA. xfma@biology.wustl.edu
Nobuo Suga

Funding

NEURAL BASIS OF COMPLEX-SOUND PROCESSINGR01DC000175 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SUGA, NOBUO NONE · 1989 to 2009
$4.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC-00175NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000175NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC000175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ventral and medial divisions of the medial geniculate body (MGBv and MGBm) respectively are the lemniscal and nonlemniscal thalamic auditory nuclei. Lemniscal neurons are narrowly frequency tuned and provide highly specific frequency information to the primary auditory cortex (AI), whereas nonlemniscal neurons are broadly frequency tuned and project widely to auditory cortical areas including AI. The MGBv and MGBm are presumably different not only in auditory signal processing, but also in eliciting cortical plastic changes. We electrically stimulated MGBv or MGBm neurons and found the following: (1) electric stimulation of narrowly frequency-tuned MGBv neurons evoked the shift of the frequency-tuning curves of AI neurons toward the tuning curves of the stimulated MGBv neurons. This shift was the same as that in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus and AI elicited by focal electric stimulation of AI or auditory fear conditioning. The widths of the tuning curves of the AI neurons stayed the same or slightly increased. (2) Electric stimulation of broad frequency-tuned MGBm neurons augmented the auditory responses of AI neurons and broadened their frequency-tuning curves which did not shift. These cortical changes evoked by MGBv or MGBm neurons slowly disappeared over 45-60 min after the onset of the electric stimulation. Our findings indicate that lemniscal and nonlemniscal nuclei are indeed different in eliciting cortical plastic changes: the MGBv evokes tone-specific plasticity in AI for adjusting auditory signal processing in the frequency domain, whereas the MGBm evokes nonspecific plasticity in AI for increasing the sensitivity of cortical neurons.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory CortexAuditory PathwaysChiropteraEvoked Potentials, AuditoryNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsThalamus

Identifiers

PMID19369557
PMCPMC3849483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.