Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19369445›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009

Evaluation of self-collected glans and rectal swabs from men who have sex with men for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by use of nucleic acid amplification tests.

Jeanne Moncada, Julius Schachter, Sally Liska, Clara Shayevich, Jeffrey D Klausner

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01291264 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Abbott RealTime CT/NG for the Detection of Chlamydia Trachomatis [CT] & Neisseria Gonorrhoeae [NG] From the Pharynx, Rectum & Urethra of Men Who Have Sex With Men [MSM]

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2012 to 2013Enrolled260ConditionsChlamydia Infection, Gonococcal Infection, Sexually Transmitted Diseases
NCT02870101 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Performance of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for the Detection of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia Trachomatis in Extragenital Sites

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled2,767ConditionsNeisseria Gonorrhoeae Infection, Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection, Sexually Transmitted InfectionsArmsNucleic acid amplification test 1 for NG and CT, Nucleic acid amplification test 2 for NG and CT, Nucleic acid amplification test 3 for NG and CT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Serologic correlation of a research-use-onlyJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Gaps in Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Among Men who Have Sex with Men in Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Care in the United States.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Simultaneous Evaluation of Diagnostic Assays for Pharyngeal and Rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis Using a Master Protocol.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Alarming incidence of genital mycoplasmas among HIV-1-infected MSM in Jiangsu, China.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeanne MoncadaChlamydia Laboratory at SFGH, UCSF Department of Laboratory Medicine, Bldg. 30, Rm. 416, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA. Jeanne.Moncada@ucsf.edu
Julius Schachter
Sally Liska
Clara Shayevich
Jeffrey D Klausner
San Francisco Department of Public Health · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-collected glans and rectal swab specimens from men who have sex with men (MSM) may be appropriate, convenient specimens for testing. We evaluated the use of self-collected swabs for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by a transcription-mediated amplification test (AC2; Aptima Combo 2; Gen-Probe Inc.) and a strand displacement amplification test (SDA; ProbeTec; Becton Dickinson Co.) in MSM seen at the city sexually transmitted disease clinic in San Francisco, CA. For the glans swab specimen, subjects enrolled early in the study rolled a Dacron swab across the meatus three times (method 1). A slightly more invasive procedure was performed later in the study: the subjects inserted the swab 1/4 in. into the urethra, rotated the swab, and then withdrew the swab (method 2). MSM self-collected a rectal swab specimen and also provided first-catch urine (FCU). Additional rectal swab samples were then obtained by the clinician. For the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, all swabs were evaluated by AC2 and SDA, FCU was tested by AC2, and the clinician-collected rectal swabs were cultured. A rectal true-positive (TP) result was defined as a culture-positive result for C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae, two or more positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) results, or a single NAAT-positive result confirmed by an alternate amplification method (the Aptima C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae test). A glans TP result was defined as a positive result for FCU, positive results for both glans specimens (one tested by AC2 and one tested by SDA), or a positive result for a single glans specimen confirmed by an alternate amplification method. The prevalence rates of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae by testing of FCU were 6.8% (60/882 specimens) and 12.2% (108/882 specimens), respectively. Mixed results were obtained with the glans swab: N. gonorrhoeae detection by AC2 and SDA (method 1) had the best performance (sensitivities, >92%) with samples from a population with a higher prevalence of infection, but their performance for the detection of C. trachomatis was poor and varied by collection method (sensitivities, 56 to 68%). The prevalence rates of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in the rectum were 7.3% (66/907 specimens) and 9.4% (83/882 specimens), respectively. The sensitivities of the tests with self-collected and clinician-collected rectal swab specimens were comparable (for C. trachomatis, 41% and 44%, respectively, by SDA and 82% and 71%, respectively, by AC2; for N. gonorrhoeae, 77% and 68%, respectively, by SDA and 84% and 78%, respectively, by AC2). AC2 and SDA were far superior to culture for the detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in the rectum, with both tests detecting at least twice as many infections. While we found self-collected rectal swabs from MSM to be valid specimens for testing, the sensitivities of the tests with glans swab specimens were disappointing except for those from patients with symptomatic N. gonorrhoeae infections. Self-collected glans swab specimens may not be appropriate for the detection of C. trachomatis or for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae in low-risk or asymptomatic patients by AC2 and SDA, and we would not recommend their use on the basis of our results. Further studies are needed.

Indexed as

Self-ExaminationChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisGonorrheaHealth Services ResearchHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleNeisseria gonorrhoeaeNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPenisPrevalenceRectumSan FranciscoSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID19369445
PMCPMC2691064
OpenAlexW2105101214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.