Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19369294›Full record

Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2009

A randomized controlled trial of treatment options for troublesome uterine bleeding in Implanon users.

E Weisberg, M Hickey, D Palmer, V O'Connor, L A Salamonsen, J K Findlay, I S Fraser

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01384331 (Phase 4 Study Comparison of Two Combined Oral Contraceptive Regimens and an Intravaginal Hormonal Ring Against Placebo for Management of Bleeding Problems in Women Using Implanon, the Sub-dermal Contraceptive Implant), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01384331 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Phase 4 Study Comparison of Two Combined Oral Contraceptive Regimens and an Intravaginal Hormonal Ring Against Placebo for Management of Bleeding Problems in Women Using Implanon, the Sub-dermal Contraceptive Implant

TypeinterventionalSponsorFamily Planning Association New South WalesRan2011 to 2013Enrolled200ConditionsMenstrual ProblemArmsMarvelon
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Menstruation: science and society.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Iatrogenic unscheduled (breakthrough) endometrial bleeding.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2012
    Review
  10. Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

E WeisbergSydney Centre for Reproductive Health Research, Research Division of Family Planning NSW, 328-336 Liverpool Road, Ashfield, Sydney, NSW 2131, Australia. edithw@fpnsw.org.au
M Hickey
D Palmer
V O'Connor
L A Salamonsen
J K Findlay
I S Fraser
St Vincents Institute of Medical Research · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUBond University · AUKing Edward Memorial Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Control of menstrual bleeding disturbances in womenR01HD043192 · NICHD · SYDNEY CENTRE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HLTH RES · PI FRASER, IAN S · 2002 to 2006
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS 5R01 HD43 192-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPilot data have indicated that both doxycycline alone and mifepristone combined with ethinyl estradiol (EE) are effective in stopping episodes of bleeding in Implanon users with troublesome bleeding. We compared four treatments against a placebo in Implanon users and tested whether repeated treatment improved subsequent bleeding patterns.

methodImplanon users aged 18-45 years were randomized to treatment with (i) mifepristone 25 mg given twice on day 1 followed by 4 days of EE 20 microg; (ii) doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 5 days; (iii) mifepristone 25 mg given twice on day 1 plus doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 5 days; (iv) doxycycline 100 mg twice daily with EE 20 microg daily; and (v) placebo twice daily for 5 days. The primary end-point was the number of days of bleeding/spotting immediately following initiation of the first 5-day course of each therapy, compared with placebo.

resultsThere were 204 women assigned to treatment. Mifepristone in combination with either EE or doxycycline was significantly more effective in stopping an episode of bleeding (mean 4.0 days (CI 3.5-4.6) and 4.4 days (CI 3.8-5.2), respectively) than doxycycline alone or in combination with EE, or placebo (6.4 days (CI 4.4-9.2), 6.4 days (CI 4.8-8.6) and 6.4 days (CL 5.1-8.0), respectively).

conclusionMifepristone combined with either EE or doxycycline was significantly more effective than placebo in terminating an episode of bleeding in Implanon users. However there was no improvement in subsequent bleeding patterns. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTR # 012605000206628.

Indexed as

AdultContraceptive Agents, FemaleDesogestrelDoxycyclineEthinyl EstradiolFemaleHumansMetrorrhagiaMifepristoneUterine HemorrhageContraceptive Agents, FemaleDesogestrelDoxycyclineEthinyl EstradioletonogestrelMifepristone

Identifiers

PMID19369294
PMCPMC2710284
OpenAlexW2111008791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.