ArticleHuman pathology2009
Specific detection of prostate cancer cells in urine by multiplex immunofluorescence cytology.
Article in Human pathology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiplex Cryoimmunostaining in Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies and Effusion Samples: Preliminary Results.Acta cytologica · 2026Article
- Bladder Washing Cytology in the Detection of High-Grade Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Detection of rare prostate cancer cells in human urine offers prospect of non-invasive diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Overexpression of Nucleolin and Associated Genes in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- A transcriptional biosensor to monitor single cancer cell therapeutic responses by bioluminescence microscopy.Theranostics · 2022Article
- Prominence of urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer in the COVID-19 era: From the commercially available to new prospective candidates.Investigative and clinical urology · 2021Review
- Specific Detection of Prostate Cancer Cells in Urine by RNA In Situ Hybridization.The Journal of urology · 2021Article
- A novel method for detection of exfoliated prostate cancer cells in urine by RNA in situ hybridization.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2021Article
- Epigenetic field alterations in non-tumor prostate tissues detect prostate cancer in urine.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2021Article
- Voided urine test to diagnose prostate cancer: Preliminary report.CytoJournal · 2021Article
- The Percentage of Free PSA and Urinary Markers Distinguish Prostate Cancer from Benign Hyperplasia and Contribute to a More Accurate Indication for Prostate Biopsy.Biomedicines · 2020Article
- Approaches to urinary detection of prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2019Review
- A Rich Array of Prostate Cancer Molecular Biomarkers: Opportunities and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Cellular Refractive Index Comparison of Various Prostate Cancer and Noncancerous Cell Lines via Photonic-Crystal Biosensor.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2019Article
- Screening of urine identifies PLA2G16 as a field defect methylation biomarker for prostate cancer detection.PloS one · 2019Article
- Long Noncoding RNAs AC009014.3 and Newly Discovered XPLAID Differentiate Aggressive and Indolent Prostate Cancers.Translational oncology · 2018Article
- Detection of glypican-1 (GPC-1) expression in urine cell sediments in prostate cancer.PloS one · 2018Article
- Metabolic alterations in urine extracellular vesicles are associated to prostate cancer pathogenesis and progression.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate cancer biomarkers are enriched in urine after prostatic manipulation, suggesting that whole cells might also be detectable for diagnosis. We tested multiplex staining of urinary sediments as a minimally invasive method to detect prostate cancer. Urine samples were collected from 35 men who had prostatic massage (attentive digital rectal examination) in a urology clinic and from 15 control men without urologic disease and without massage, for a total of 50 specimens (27 cancer-positive cases and 23 cancer-negative cases). LNCaP prostate cancer cells spiked into urine were used for initial marker optimization. Urine sediments were cytospun onto glass slides and stained. Multiplex urine cytology was compared with conventional urine cytology for cancer detection; anti-alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase antibody was used as a marker of prostate cancer cells, anti-Nkx3.1 as a marker of prostate epithelial cells, anti-nucleolin as a marker of nucleoli, and 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole to highlight nuclei. Prostate cancer cells were successfully visualized by combined staining for alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase, Nkx3.1, and nucleolin. Of the 25 informative cases with biopsy-proven prostate cancer, 9 were diagnosed as suspicious or positive by multiplex immunofluorescence urine cytology, but only 4 were similarly judged by conventional cytology. All cases without cancer were read as negative by both methods. The multiplex cytology sensitivity for cancer detection in informative cases was 36% (9/25), and specificity was 100% (8/8). In conclusion, we have successfully achieved multiple staining for alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase, Nkx3.1, nucleolin, and 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole to detect prostate cancer cells in urine. Further refinements in marker selection and technique may increase sensitivity and applicability for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.