Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19368959›Full record

ArticleHuman pathology2009

Specific detection of prostate cancer cells in urine by multiplex immunofluorescence cytology.

Kazutoshi Fujita, Christian P Pavlovich, George J Netto, Yuko Konishi, William B Isaacs, Syed Ali, Angelo De Marzo, Alan K Meeker

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human pathology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Overexpression of Nucleolin and Associated Genes in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Epigenetic field alterations in non-tumor prostate tissues detect prostate cancer in urine.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Approaches to urinary detection of prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazutoshi FujitaDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Christian P Pavlovich
George J Netto
Yuko Konishi
William B Isaacs
Syed Ali
Angelo De Marzo
Alan K Meeker
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer Detection by Molecular UrinalysisK23DK071262 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PAVLOVICH, CHRISTIAN P · 2005 to 2010
$728k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK071262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer biomarkers are enriched in urine after prostatic manipulation, suggesting that whole cells might also be detectable for diagnosis. We tested multiplex staining of urinary sediments as a minimally invasive method to detect prostate cancer. Urine samples were collected from 35 men who had prostatic massage (attentive digital rectal examination) in a urology clinic and from 15 control men without urologic disease and without massage, for a total of 50 specimens (27 cancer-positive cases and 23 cancer-negative cases). LNCaP prostate cancer cells spiked into urine were used for initial marker optimization. Urine sediments were cytospun onto glass slides and stained. Multiplex urine cytology was compared with conventional urine cytology for cancer detection; anti-alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase antibody was used as a marker of prostate cancer cells, anti-Nkx3.1 as a marker of prostate epithelial cells, anti-nucleolin as a marker of nucleoli, and 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole to highlight nuclei. Prostate cancer cells were successfully visualized by combined staining for alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase, Nkx3.1, and nucleolin. Of the 25 informative cases with biopsy-proven prostate cancer, 9 were diagnosed as suspicious or positive by multiplex immunofluorescence urine cytology, but only 4 were similarly judged by conventional cytology. All cases without cancer were read as negative by both methods. The multiplex cytology sensitivity for cancer detection in informative cases was 36% (9/25), and specificity was 100% (8/8). In conclusion, we have successfully achieved multiple staining for alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase, Nkx3.1, nucleolin, and 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole to detect prostate cancer cells in urine. Further refinements in marker selection and technique may increase sensitivity and applicability for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorCytological TechniquesFalse Negative ReactionsFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstateProstatic NeoplasmsStaining and LabelingUrineBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID19368959
PMCPMC2757169
OpenAlexW1995741808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.