ArticleCurrent biology : CB2009
Plant evolution: measuring the length of the day.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Cues for Phenological Events in the Flowering Cycle in Avocado.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Light, rather than circadian rhythm, regulates gas exchange in ferns and lycophytes.Plant physiology · 2023Article
- MADS-box transcription factors MADS11 and DAL1 interact to mediate the vegetative-to-reproductive transition in pine.Plant physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How has the ability of plants to measure the length of the day evolved? The finding that the genome of the unicellular alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii contains a gene homologous to, and functionally conserved with, the Arabidopsis gene CONSTANS might provide part of the answer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.