ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2009
Structural determinants of protein folding.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvement of protein purity in etanercept production through process optimization in recombinant CHO cell-based transient gene expression system.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Article
- Cavity-Filling Mutations as a Strategy to Stabilize Prefusion Viral Fusion Proteins for Vaccine Design.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Electrostatic charge at the biomaterial-pathogen interface influences antibiotic efficacy.Advanced biotechnology · 2025Article
- The Impact of Thermal and pH Variations on the Structure of Cathepsin D in the Hepatopancreas of Japanese Clam (Current protein & peptide science · 2025Article
- New genomic resources inform transcriptomic responses to heavy metal toxins in the common Eastern bumble bee Bombus impatiens.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Protein Misfolding in Pregnancy: Current Insights, Potential Mechanisms, and Implications for the Pathogenesis of Preeclampsia.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Synopsis of Proteins and Their Purification.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Toxinology provides multidirectional and multidimensional opportunities: A personal perspective.Toxicon: X · 2020Article
- Information, programme, signal: dead metaphors that negate the agency of organisms.Interdisciplinary science reviews : ISR · 2020Article
- Insights into the Folding of Disulfide-Rich μ-Conotoxins.ACS omega · 2018Article
- Is information a proper observable for biological organization?Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2012Review
- Baculovirus GP64 disulfide bonds: the intermolecular disulfide bond of Autographa californica multicapsid nucleopolyhedrovirus GP64 is not essential for membrane fusion and virion budding.Journal of virology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The last several decades have seen an explosion of knowledge in the field of structural biology. With critical advances in spectroscopic techniques in examining structures of biomacromolecules, in maturation of molecular biology techniques, as well as vast improvements in computation prowess, protein structures are now being elucidated at an unprecedented rate. In spite of all the recent advances, the protein folding puzzle remains as one of the fundamental biochemical challenges. A facet to this empiric problem is the structural determinants of protein folding. What are the driving forces that pivot a polypeptide chain to a specific conformation amongst the vast conformation space? In this review, we shall discuss some of the structural determinants to protein folding that have been identified in the recent decades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.