Trial reportJournal of neurology2009
IVIg dose increase in multifocal motor neuropathy: a prospective six month follow-up.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunoglobulin for multifocal motor neuropathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Intravenous immunoglobulin frequency in multifocal motor neuropathy: a retrospective study of nerve conduction outcomes.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Multifocal Motor Neuropathy: A Narrative Review.Muscle & nerve · 2025Review
- Use of Health Technology Assessment for the Continued Funding of Health Technologies: The Case of Immunoglobulins for the Management of Multifocal Motor Neuropathy.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of CAR T cells in a patient with lymphoma and a coexisting autoimmune neuropathy.Blood advances · 2020Article
- Human immune globulin infusion in the management of multifocal motor neuropathy.Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease · 2016Review
- Optimizing IgG therapy in chronic autoimmune neuropathies: a hypothesis driven approach.Muscle & nerve · 2015Review
- Diagnosis and treatment of chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2014Review
- Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in chronic neurological diseases: do we have maintenance dose right?Autoimmune diseases · 2014Article
- Multifocal motor neuropathy: a review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2014Review
- Review
- Multifocal motor neuropathy: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment strategies.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2011Review
- Chronic dysimmune neuropathies: Beyond chronic demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this prospective, non-randomized 6-month observational study we evaluated the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) dose increase in patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Diagnosis according to AAEM criteria, repetitive IVIg treatment for at least one year, persistent paresis and conduction block, stable symptoms and findings for at least six months were inclusion criteria. Nine patients (7 men) were identified and approved to standardized increase of IVIg dose. Patients were monitored using clinical scores and electrophysiological studies. Dose was increased from a baseline of 0.5 g/kg per month [mean, range: 0.1-1.1], given at variable intervals [4-12 weeks] to 1.2 g/kg per month given over 3 consecutive days planned for 6 cycles. If the patients' motor function did not improve after two cycles they entered step two: Dose was increased to 2 g/kg per month given over 5 consecutive days. The increased dose was maintained for 6 months. Assessments were performed by the same investigator, not involved in the patient's management, at baseline, after 2 and after 6 months. Following dose increase, motor function significantly improved in 6 patients (p = 0.014), 2 patients entered step two, 1 patient withdrew due to absent efficacy. Higher doses of IVIg caused more side effects, however, transient and rarely severe (p = 0.014). IVIg dose increase may improve motor functions in patients with stable MMN on long-term IVIg therapy independent of baseline dose. Improvement of motor function was associated with shorter disease duration (p = 0.008), but not with degree of muscle atrophy (p = 0.483). The treatment strategy to try to find the lowest effective dose and the longest tolerated interval might lead to underdosing in the long-term in many patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.