ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Realhand high dexterity instruments for the treatment of stage I uterine malignancy.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecology: review of literature and available technology.Journal of minimally invasive gynecologyReview
- Initial experience of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection for right colon cancer using ArtisentialJournal of minimal access surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the impact of RealHand instruments on laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) for the treatment of stage I uterine cancer.
methodsThis was a single-center, nonrandomized, consecutive patient pilot study. Patient status was evaluated in terms of operative morbidity, length of surgery, anesthesia time, body mass index (BMI), estimated blood loss, uterine weight, and hospital stay.
resultsIn the group of 10 patients, mean operative time was 1.7 hours, and anesthesia time was 2.3 hours. Mean estimated blood loss was 70mL, and patient hospital stay was 31.8 hours. No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. Blood loss, anesthesia time, BMI, and uterine weight were significant predictors of operative time. In one patient, LAVH using the RealHand instruments was canceled because of deep pelvic visualization difficulties, resulting in a conversion to laparotomy.
conclusionWe present the first reported individual physician LAVH experience using RealHand instruments for the treatment of clinical stage I uterine cancer. The reported operative time, reasonable patient complication rates, and acceptable postoperative stay suggest that these innovative surgical instruments may have significant promise in the treatment of patients diagnosed with this gynecologic disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19366537PMC3015891W66463271What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.