Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19365632›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2009

Rejection of intradermally injected syngeneic tumor cells from mice by specific elimination of tumor-associated macrophages with liposome-encapsulated dichloromethylene diphosphonate, followed by induction of CD11b(+)/CCR3(-)/Gr-1(-) cells cytotoxic against the tumor cells.

Takeshi Takahashi, Minenori Ibata, Zhiqian Yu, Yosuke Shikama, Yasuo Endo, Yasunori Miyauchi, Masanori Nakamura, Junko Tashiro-Yamaji, Sayako Miura-Takeda, Tetsunosuke Shimizu and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Tumor Microenvironment in SCC: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takeshi TakahashiDepartment of Physiology, Osaka Medical College, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Japan.
Minenori Ibata
Zhiqian Yu
Yosuke Shikama
Yasuo Endo
Yasunori Miyauchi
Masanori Nakamura
Junko Tashiro-Yamaji
Sayako Miura-Takeda
Tetsunosuke Shimizu
Masashi Okada
Koichi Ueda
Takahiro Kubota
Ryotaro Yoshida
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPTohoku University · JPShowa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor cell expansion relies on nutrient supply, and oxygen limitation is central in controlling neovascularization and tumor spread. Monocytes infiltrate into tumors from the circulation along defined chemotactic gradients, differentiate into tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and then accumulate in the hypoxic areas. Elevated TAM density in some regions or overall TAM numbers are correlated with increased tumor angiogenesis and a reduced host survival in the case of various types of tumors. To evaluate the role of TAMs in tumor growth, we here specifically eliminated TAMs by in vivo application of dichloromethylene diphosphonate (DMDP)-containing liposomes to mice bearing various types of tumors (e.g., B16 melanoma, KLN205 squamous cell carcinoma, and 3LL Lewis lung cancer), all of which grew in the dermis of syngeneic mouse skin. When DMDP-liposomes were injected into four spots to surround the tumor on day 0 or 5 after tumor injection and every third day thereafter, both the induction of TAMs and the tumor growth were suppressed in a dose-dependent and injection number-dependent manner; and unexpectedly, the tumor cells were rejected by 12 injections of three times-diluted DMDP-liposomes. The absence of TAMs in turn induced the invasion of inflammatory cells into or around the tumors; and the major population of effector cells cytotoxic against the target tumor cells were CD11b(+) monocytic macrophages, but not CCR3(+) eosinophils or Gr-1(+) neutrophils. These results indicate that both the absence of TAMs and invasion of CD11b(+) monocytic macrophages resulted in the tumor rejection.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Lewis LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellCD11b AntigenCell Line, TumorClodronic AcidCytotoxicity, ImmunologicImmunohistochemistryInjections, IntradermalLiposomesMacrophagesMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred DBANeoplasms, ExperimentalCcr3 protein, mouseCD11b AntigenClodronic AcidGr-1 protein, mouseLiposomesReceptors, CCR3Receptors, Chemokine

Identifiers

PMID19365632
PMCPMC11030634
OpenAlexW1967710585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.