Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19363812›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2009

Spatial representations of odorants in olfactory bulbs of rats and mice: similarities and differences in chemotopic organization.

Brett A Johnson, Zhe Xu, Sameera S Ali, Michael Leon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Odor encoding by signals in the olfactory bulb.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dynamic Impairment of Olfactory Behavior and Signaling Mediated by an Olfactory Corticofugal System.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Differential associative training enhances olfactory acuity in Drosophila melanogaster.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brett A JohnsonDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4550, USA. bajohnso@uci.edu
Zhe Xu
Sameera S Ali
Michael Leon
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

NEURAL PROCESSES IN OLFACTORY CODINGR01DC003545 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LEON, MICHAEL · 1998 to 2007
$2.8M
Models of Sensory CodingR01DC006391 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LEON, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2008
$1.3M
Neuroinformatic Analysis of Olfactory CodingR01DC006516 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LEON, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2006
$783k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC006391NIDCD NIH HHS DC006516NIDCD NIH HHS DC03545NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003545NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006391NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In previous studies, we mapped glomerular layer 2-deoxyglucose uptake evoked by hundreds of both systematically related and chemically distinct odorants in rat olfactory bulbs. To determine which principles of chemotopic organization revealed in these studies may be more fundamental and which may be more species typical, we now have characterized patterns of responses to 30 of these odorants in mice. We found that only a few odorants evoked their multiple foci of peak activity in exactly the same locations in the two species. In mice, as in rats, odorants that shared molecular features evoked overlapping patterns, but the locations of the feature-responsive domains often differed in rats and mice. In rats, increasing carbon number within a homologous series of aliphatic odorants is generally associated with rostral and ventral progressions of activity within domains responding to odorant functional group and/or hydrocarbon backbone. Such chemotopic progressions were not obvious in mice, which instead showed more abrupt differences in activated glomeruli within the domains for odorants differing by a single methylene group. Despite the differences, quantitative relationships between overall uptake patterns exhibited a similar organization with respect to odorant chemistry for the two species, probably as a result of partial overlaps of peak domains and more extensive overlaps in large, low-activity areas for rats and mice. We conclude that clustering responses to shared odorant features may be a general strategy for odor coding but that the specific locations of high-activity domains may be unique to a species.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsHydrocarbonsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOlfactory BulbPhotomicrographyPhysical StimulationPrincipal Component AnalysisRatsSmellHydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID19363812
PMCPMC4429802
OpenAlexW2081605205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.