Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19363655›Full record

ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2010

Effect of treatment with probiotics as water additives on tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) growth performance and immune response.

Xuxia Zhou, Ziqiang Tian, Yanbo Wang, Weifen Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Investigation of the Fermentation Process ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effects of DietaryAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characteristics and biological control functions ofAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Characteristics and Application ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Dietary supplementation of Nile tilapia (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xuxia ZhouMicrobiology Division, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, 164# Qiutao North Road, 310029, Hangzhou, China.
Ziqiang TianRiver and Coastal Environment Research Center, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, 100012, Beijing, China.
Yanbo WangFood Quality and Safety Department, Zhejiang Gongshang University, 310035, Hangzhou, China.
Weifen LiMicrobiology Division, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, 164# Qiutao North Road, 310029, Hangzhou, China. wfli@zju.edu.cn.
Zhejiang University · CNChinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences · CNZhejiang Gongshang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A feeding trial was conducted for 40 days to delineate the effect of treatment with probiotics as water additives on tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) growth performance and immune response. About 360 juveniles were randomly distributed into four treatment groups, each with three replicates. Different probiotics (T-1, Bacillus subtilis B10; T-2, Bacillus coagulans B16; T-3, Rhodopseudomonas palustris G06) were added to the water of tanks at final concentration of 1 x 10(7) cfu ml(-1) every 2 days, with no probiotic added to control tanks. At the end of the feeding trial, fish treated with B. coagulans B16 (T-2) and R. palustris G06 (T-3) had significantly (P < 0.05) higher final weight, daily weight gain, and specific growth rate compared with those treated with B. subtilis B10 (T-1) and those without probiotics (control). The highest (P < 0.05) content of total serum protein was found in T-2 compared with that in T-1, T-3, and the control. However, albumin concentration and albumin/globulin ratio were not affected by the probiotics treatments. Compared with the control, probiotic supplementation remarkably improved activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase (P < 0.05). T-2 fish exhibited higher average myeloperoxidase activity than the control, T-1, and T-3 groups. Regarding serum lysozyme content in tilapia, assays showed no difference (P > 0.05) among the treatment groups. Furthermore, probiotics treatments remarkably increased respiratory burst activity compared with control, with T-2 showing higher values than T-1 and T-3. This indicated that treatment with probiotics, B. coagulans B16 and R. palustris G06, as water additives could be used to enhance immune and health status, thereby improving growth performance of O. niloticus.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAquacultureBlood ProteinsBody WeightCase-Control StudiesCatalaseCichlidsPeroxidaseProbioticsSerum AlbuminSpecies SpecificitySuperoxide DismutaseWater MicrobiologyBlood ProteinsCatalasePeroxidaseSerum AlbuminSuperoxide Dismutase

Identifiers

PMID19363655
OpenAlexW2041721910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.