Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19362815›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2009

Nuance in the double-helix and its role in protein-DNA recognition.

Remo Rohs, Sean M West, Peng Liu, Barry Honig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Slow motions in A·T rich DNA sequence.Scientific reports · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Remo RohsHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Columbia University, 1130 St. Nicholas Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Sean M West
Peng Liu
Barry Honig

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been known for some time that the double-helix is not a uniform structure but rather exhibits sequence-specific variations that, combined with base-specific intermolecular interactions, offer the possibility of numerous modes of protein-DNA recognition. All-atom simulations have revealed mechanistic insights into the structural and energetic basis of various recognition mechanisms for a number of protein-DNA complexes while coarser grained simulations have begun to provide an understanding of the function of larger assemblies. Molecular simulations have also been applied to the prediction of transcription factor binding sites, while empirical approaches have been developed to predict nucleosome positioning. Studies that combine and integrate experimental, statistical and computational data offer the promise of rapid advances in our understanding of protein-DNA recognition mechanisms.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationBinding SitesComputer SimulationDNAMonte Carlo MethodNucleosomesProtein ConformationProteinsTranscription FactorsDNANucleosomesProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19362815
PMCPMC2701566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.