Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19362800›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2009

Impact of mailed and automated telephone reminders on receipt of repeat mammograms: a randomized controlled trial.

Jessica T DeFrank, Barbara K Rimer, Jennifer M Gierisch, J Michael Bowling, David Farrell, Celette S Skinner

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01148875 completednot on this map

Finding the M.I.N.C. for Mammography Maintenance

TypeobservationalSponsorUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2004 to 2010Enrolled3,547ConditionsBreast CancerArmsMammography appointment reminders, telephone counseling
NCT02360605 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Health Literacy Interventions to Overcome Disparities in CRC Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center ShreveportRan2015 to 2018Enrolled620ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsautomated telephone reminder, prevention coordinator, Health literacy appropriate education and demonstration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica T DeFrankGillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA. defrank@email.unc.edu
Barbara K Rimer
Jennifer M Gierisch
J Michael Bowling
David Farrell
Celette S Skinner
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDepartment of Health · ZADuke Medical Center · USPeople Designs (United States) · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

FINDING THE M.I.N.C. FOR MAMMOGRAPHY MAINTENANCER01CA105786 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RIMER, BARBARA K. · 2003 to 2009
$3.7M
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPT32HS000079 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EDELMAN, DAVID · 1998 to 2013
$1.9M
AHRQ HHS 2T32HS000079AHRQ HHS T32 HS000079NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA105786NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study compares the efficacy of three types of reminders in promoting annual repeat mammography screening.

designRCT. SETTING AND

participantsStudy recruitment occurred in 2004-2005. Participants were recruited through the North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees. All were aged 40-75 years and had a screening mammogram prior to study enrollment. A total of 3547 women completed baseline telephone interviews.

interventionPrior to study recruitment, women were assigned randomly to one of three reminder groups: (1) printed enhanced usual care reminders (EUCRs); (2) automated telephone reminders (ATRs) identical in content to EUCRs; or (3) enhanced letter reminders that included additional information guided by behavioral theory. Interventions were delivered 2-3 months prior to women's mammography due dates.

main outcome measuresRepeat mammography adherence, defined as having a mammogram no sooner than 10 months and no later than 14 months after the enrollment mammogram.

resultsEach intervention produced adherence proportions that ranged from 72% to 76%. Post-intervention adherence rates increased by an absolute 17.8% from baseline. Women assigned to ATRs were significantly more likely to have had mammograms than women assigned to EUCRs (p=0.014). Comparisons of reminder efficacy did not vary across key subgroups.

conclusionsAlthough all reminders were effective in promoting repeat mammography adherence, ATRs were the most effective and lowest in cost. Health organizations should consider using ATRs to maximize proportions of members who receive mammograms at annual intervals.

Indexed as

Reminder SystemsAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePostal ServiceSocioeconomic FactorsTelephone

Identifiers

PMID19362800
PMCPMC2698939
OpenAlexW2012110554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.