Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19360462›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2009

A decade of genetic counseling in frontotemporal dementia affected families: few counseling requests and much familial opposition to testing.

S R Riedijk, M F N Niermeijer, D Dooijes, A Tibben

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Deciding on genetic testing for familial dementia: Perspectives of patients and families.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ethical issues in neurogenetics.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Genetic counseling for frontotemporal dementias.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2011
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S R RiedijkDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Centre, Westzeedijk 112, 3016 AH Rotterdam, The Netherlands, s.riedijk@erasmusmc.nl
M F N Niermeijer
D Dooijes
A Tibben
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decade of genetic counseling of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) affected families has generated two important observations. First, the uptake rate for presymptomatic testing for FTD is low in our department of Clinical Genetics at the Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands. Second, FTD at-risk counselees reported substantial familial opposition to genetic testing, which is distinct from the attitude in Huntington Disease affected families. We hypothesize that the low acceptance for FTD genetic counseling is consequential to the familial opposition and explain this within the theoretical framework of separation-individuation. Furthermore, we hypothesize that separation-individuation problems do not similarly influence the acceptance of HD genetic counseling, due to the educative role of the well-organised patient organization for HD in the Netherlands. We offer counseling recommendations that serve to facilitate the individuation of the counselee with respect to the FTD genetic test.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingDementiaFamilyGenetic TestingHumansNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID19360462
PMCPMC2706981
OpenAlexW2021147223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.