ArticleRheumatology international2009
High frequency of Smith autoantibodies in Omani patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-ribosomal P protein IgG autoantibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: diagnostic performance and clinical profile.BMC medicine · 2013Article
- Anti-Sm faces a threat to its reigning position as the marker antibody.Rheumatology international · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the frequency and significance of some antinuclear autoantibodies in Omani patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-double stranded-DNA (anti-dsDNA), and anti-Smith (anti-Sm) autoantibodies were investigated in 60 Omani patients clinically diagnosed with SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology Criteria. The SLE group included 57 females and 3 males with an average age of 26 years. In addition, a group of 60 healthy Omanis (26 females and 34 males; average age 25 years) was used as a control. ANA patterns and autoantibody profile were assayed by indirect immunofluorescence assay using Hep-2 cells and liver/kidney/stomach tissue, respectively. Anti-dsDNA were examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays; anti-Sm antibodies were measured by immunoblotting technique. Out of the 60 SLE patients, 59/60 (98.3%) were seropositive for ANA. Anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm each was detected in 50/60 (83.3%) of the Omani patients. The homogenous pattern of ANA was detected in 30/60 (50%) of patients, whereas the frequency of fine-speckled and coarse-speckled was 16/60 (26.7%) and 6/60 (10%), respectively. High titers (≥ 1:320) of ANA was detected in 56/60 (93.3%) of SLE patients. High titers of anti-Sm were detected in 22/60 (33.3%) of patients. High titers (>100 IU/ml) of anti-dsDNA were detected in 40/60 (66.7%) of patients. In the control group, ANA were detected in 8/60 (13.3%) but at low titers, whereas anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm were not detected in the healthy control group. This study shows that anti-Sm is as important as the anti-dsDNA for confirming the diagnosis of SLE and that anti-Sm occurs at a much higher frequency (83.3%) than that reported in other populations indicating the importance of this specific autoantibody for the diagnosis and possibly prognosis of Omani SLE patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.