Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19359472›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Association of survival and disease progression with chromosomal instability: a genomic exploration of colorectal cancer.

Michal Sheffer, Manny D Bacolod, Or Zuk, Sarah F Giardina, Hanna Pincas, Francis Barany, Philip B Paty, William L Gerald, Daniel A Notterman, Eytan Domany

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 234 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
234citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

234 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 415 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prognostic and predictive values of CXCL10 in colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Tumour-infiltrating CD8British journal of cancer · 2019
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. FXN predicts poor prognosis in colon adenocarcinoma and correlates with immune cell infiltration.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. METTL1-mediated mCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

174 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michal ShefferDepartment of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Manny D Bacolod
Or Zuk
Sarah F Giardina
Hanna Pincas
Francis Barany
Philip B Paty
William L Gerald
Daniel A Notterman
Eytan Domany
Cornell University · USPrinceton University · USWeizmann Institute of Science · ILMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

NEW METHODS FOR CANCER DETECTIONP01CA065930 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BARANY, FRANCIS · 1997 to 2007
$14.1M
Scientific and Technical Computing CoreP2CHD047879 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SALGANIK, MATTHEW J. · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA065930NCI NIH HHS P01-CA65930PHS HHS 263MQ610681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During disease progression the cells that comprise solid malignancies undergo significant changes in gene copy number and chromosome structure. Colorectal cancer provides an excellent model to study this process. To indentify and characterize chromosomal abnormalities in colorectal cancer, we performed a statistical analysis of 299 expression and 130 SNP arrays profiled at different stages of the disease, including normal tissue, adenoma, stages 1-4 adenocarcinoma, and metastasis. We identified broad (> 1/2 chromosomal arm) and focal (< 1/2 chromosomal arm) events. Broad amplifications were noted on chromosomes 7, 8q, 13q, 20, and X and broad deletions on chromosomes 4, 8p, 14q, 15q, 17p, 18, 20p, and 22q. Focal events (gains or losses) were identified in regions containing known cancer pathway genes, such as VEGFA, MYC, MET, FGF6, FGF23, LYN, MMP9, MYBL2, AURKA, UBE2C, and PTEN. Other focal events encompassed potential new candidate tumor suppressors (losses) and oncogenes (gains), including CCDC68, CSMD1, POLR1D, and PMEPA1. From the expression data, we identified genes whose expression levels reflected their copy number changes and used this relationship to impute copy number changes to samples without accompanying SNP data. This analysis provided the statistical power to show that deletions of 8p, 4p, and 15q are associated with survival and disease progression, and that samples with simultaneous deletions in 18q, 8p, 4p, and 15q have a particularly poor prognosis. Annotation analysis reveals that the oxidative phosphorylation pathway shows a strong tendency for decreased expression in the samples characterized by poor prognosis.

Indexed as

Chromosomal InstabilityChromosome DeletionColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFibroblast Growth Factor-23Gene DosageGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome, HumanHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOxidation-ReductionPhosphorylationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA, UntranslatedSurvival RateFGF23 protein, humanFibroblast Growth Factor-23RNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID19359472
PMCPMC2678450
OpenAlexW2128502368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.