ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2009
The evolution and application of techniques in molecular biology to human brain tumors: a 25 year perspective.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discovery of Power-Law Growth in the Self-Renewal of Heterogeneous Glioma Stem Cell Populations.PloS one · 2015Article
- The neurobiology of gliomas: from cell biology to the development of therapeutic approaches.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2011Review
- A genotype resource for postmortem brain samples from the Autism Tissue Program.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2011Article
- Increased inhibitor of differentiation 4 (id4) expression in glioblastoma: a tissue microarray study.Journal of Cancer · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the establishment of the AANS/CNS Section on Tumors in 1984, neurosurgeons have been actively involved in basic science research of human brain tumors that has moved the field forward considerably. Here, we chronicle the major advances that have been made with respect to our understanding of the concepts guiding the biology of human malignant brain tumors. Numerous technical advances in science, such as the development of gene transfer techniques, the polymerase chain reaction, the discovery of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, and the refinement of approaches to cancer cytogenetics have enabled researchers to identify many of the non-random genetic alterations associated with brain tumor growth, invasion, immunology, angiogenesis and apoptosis. These data led to some astounding progress, for example with the use of gene therapy, whereby in the 1990s several human clinical trials were conducted for patients with brain tumors. More recently, the human genome project has been completed providing a blueprint for the human species. What has followed are exciting new techniques in molecular biology such as transcriptional profiling, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-arrays, array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH), microRNA profiling, and detection of epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes. The cancer genome is now being sequenced at break neck speed using advanced DNA sequencing techniques. We are on the threshold of cataloguing the major genetic alterations observed in all human brain tumors. What will follow is modeling of these genetic alterations in systems that will allow for the development of novel pharmacotherapeutics and translational research therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.