Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19357853›Full record

ReviewChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2009

Surgical management of supratentorial ependymomas.

Aabir Chakraborty, William Harkness, Kim Phipps

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aabir ChakrabortyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, WC1N, 3JH, UK. aabirc@yahoo.com
William Harkness
Kim Phipps

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSupratentorial ependymomas are rare neoplasms accounting for just ten to 15 new cases in the UK per year. This article discusses the surgical management of these tumours. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe present our experience over the past 12 years looking, in particular, at the location, histological grading, postoperative complications, survival and progression-free survival. A literature review of publications discussing the surgical management of ependymoma over the past 10 years is then presented.

resultsThe data shows that complete surgical resection confers a significant survival advantage. There appears to be conflicting data with respect to prognosis when comparing supratentorial to infratentorial ependymoma.

conclusionThe authors suggest complete excision and advocate, where appropriate, the use of pre and intra-operative functional mapping and second-look surgery. The trade off neurological deficit in the pursuit of complete surgical excision in some instances should be considered.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainChildChild, PreschoolEpendymomaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfratentorial NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSupratentorial NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.