Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19357378›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias

A framework for managing wandering and preventing elopement.

D Helen Moore, Donna L Algase, Gail Powell-Cope, Shawn Applegarth, Elizabeth R A Beattie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pan-Canadian estimates of the prevalence and risks associated with critical wandering among home care clients.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

D Helen MooreJames A. Haley VAMC Tampa, Florida 33637, USA. Dorothy.Moore4@va.gov
Donna L Algase
Gail Powell-Cope
Shawn Applegarth
Elizabeth R A Beattie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the studyA framework aids choice of interventions to manage wandering and prevent elopement in consideration of associated risks and mobility needs of wanderers. DESIGN AND

methodsA literature review, together with research results, published wandering tools, clinical reports, author clinical experience, and consensus-based judgments was used to build a decision-making framework.

resultsReferencing a published definition of wandering and originating a clinical description of problematic wandering, authors introduce a framework comprising (1) wandering and related behaviors; (2) goals of wandering-specific care, (3) interpersonally, technologically, and policy-mediated wandering interventions, and (4) estimates of relative frequencies of wandering behaviors, magnitudes of elopement risk, and restrictiveness of strategies. IMPLICATIONS: Safeguarding wanderers from elopement risk is rendered person-centered and humane when goals of care guide intervention choice. Despite limitations, a reasoned, systematized approach to wandering management provides a basis for tailoring a specialized program of care. The need for framework refinement and related research is emphasized.

Indexed as

Wandering BehaviorArchitectural AccessibilityBehavior TherapyCaregiversDementiaHealth Facility EnvironmentHumansRecreationReinforcement, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID19357378
PMCPMC10846189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.