Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19357090›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2009

A genotype-to-phenotype map of in vitro selected RNA-cleaving DNAzymes: implications for accessing the target phenotype.

Kenny Schlosser, Jeffrey C F Lam, Yingfu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nucleobase modification by an RNA enzyme.Nucleic acids research · 2017
    Article
  3. DNA Catalysis: The Chemical Repertoire of DNAzymes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Comprehensive experimental fitness landscape and evolutionary network for small RNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  6. Article
  7. In vitro selection of metal ion-selective DNAzymes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kenny SchlosserDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey C F Lam
Yingfu Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, we describe a case study into the population dynamics of in vitro selection, using RNA-cleaving DNAzymes as a model system. We sought to understand how the composition of the population can change over time in response to different levels of selection pressure, and how well these changes are correlated with selection of the target phenotype. The model population is composed of 857 DNAzyme clones representing 215 discrete sequence classes, which had previously been identified from two parallel selection experiments, conducted under an increasingly stringent, or permissive and constant selection time pressure. In this report, we determined the principal phenotypic properties (i.e. k(obs), maximum cleavage yield and PCR efficiency) from a sample of 58 clones representing 46 different major and minor sequence classes from various rounds of each selection experiment. Interestingly, a positive correlation between the catalytic rate constant and the corresponding frequency and temporal position of a given DNAzyme was not consistently observed; however, the strength of the correlation was qualitatively higher under conditions of more stringent selection time pressure. These results suggest that the selective sampling paradigm on which in vitro selection is based, may underestimate the true functional capacity of any given random-sequence library.

Indexed as

Directed Molecular EvolutionCatalysisDNA, CatalyticGenotypePhenotypePolymerase Chain ReactionRNADNA, CatalyticRNA

Identifiers

PMID19357090
PMCPMC2699508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.