Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19357069›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2009

A toxicology for the 21st century--mapping the road ahead.

Thomas Hartung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Biomimetic lung-on-a-chip to model virus infection and drug evaluation.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Perspectives onApplied in vitro toxicology · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. 21st Century Cell Culture for 21st Century Toxicology.Chemical research in toxicology · 2017
    Article
  12. FutureTox III: Bridges for Translation.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mapping the human toxome by systems toxicology.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2014
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas HartungCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Department for Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. thartung@jhsph.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The landmark publication by the National Research Council putting forward a vision of a toxicology for the 21st century in 2007 has created an atmosphere of departure in our field. The alliances formed, symposia and meetings held and the articles following are remarkable, indicating that this is an idea whose time has come. Most of the discussion centers on the technical opportunities to map pathways of toxicity and the financing of the program. Here, the other part of the work ahead shall be discussed, that is, the focus is on regulatory implementation once the technological challenges are managed, but we are well aware that the technical aspects of what the National Academy of Science report suggests still need to be addressed: A series of challenges are put forward which we will face in addition to finding a technical solution (and its funding) to set this vision into practice. This includes the standardization and quality assurance of novel methodologies, their formal validation, their integration into test strategies including threshold setting and finally a global acceptance and implementation. This will require intense conceptual steering to have all pieces of the puzzle come together.

Indexed as

Toxicity TestsToxicologyData Interpretation, StatisticalGuidelines as TopicHumansInternationalityNational Academy of Sciences, U.S.Quality ControlResearch DesignUnited States

Identifiers

PMID19357069
PMCPMC2675641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.