Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19356242›Full record

ArticlePMC biophysics2009

An effective all-atom potential for proteins.

Anders Irbäck, Simon Mitternacht, Sandipan Mohanty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PMC biophysics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Slow Dissolution Kinetics of Model Peptide Fibrils.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Conformational and aggregation properties of the 1-93 fragment of apolipoprotein A-I.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2014
    Article
  12. Equilibrium simulations of proteins using molecular fragment replacement and NMR chemical shifts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anders IrbäckComputational Biology & Biological Physics, Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Sölvegatan 14A, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden. anders@thep.lu.se.
Simon Mitternacht
Sandipan Mohanty

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe and test an implicit solvent all-atom potential for simulations of protein folding and aggregation. The potential is developed through studies of structural and thermodynamic properties of 17 peptides with diverse secondary structure. Results obtained using the final form of the potential are presented for all these peptides. The same model, with unchanged parameters, is furthermore applied to a heterodimeric coiled-coil system, a mixed alpha/beta protein and a three-helix-bundle protein, with very good results. The computational efficiency of the potential makes it possible to investigate the free-energy landscape of these 49-67-residue systems with high statistical accuracy, using only modest computational resources by today's standards.PACS Codes: 87.14.E-, 87.15.A-, 87.15.Cc.

Identifiers

PMID19356242
PMCPMC2696411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.