Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19352654›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2010

Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty using the contralateral knee as a control group: a case-control study.

Peter M Bonutti, Michael G Zywiel, Thorsten M Seyler, Seung Yong Lee, Mike S McGrath, David R Marker, Michael A Mont

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A meta-analysis of minimally invasive and conventional medial parapatella approaches for primary total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Does minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty improve isokinetic torque?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2012
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter M BonuttiBonutti Clinic, 1303 Evergreen Avenue, Effingham, IL 62401, USA.
Michael G Zywiel
Thorsten M Seyler
Seung Yong Lee
Mike S McGrath
David R Marker
Michael A Mont

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to compare clinical and functional results of bilateral total knee arthroplasties in which a conventional total knee replacement was initially performed on one knee and a minimally invasive total knee replacement was later performed on the contralateral side. Operative factors, clinical and radiographic outcomes, and quadriceps muscle strength were evaluated in twenty-five patients (50 total knee arthroplasties). Twenty-one of the 25 patients preferred the minimally invasive approach. Knee society objective scores and range-of-motion were significantly greater in the minimally invasive group. Isokinetic testing demonstrated statistically improved quadriceps muscle strength in the minimally invasive technique group compared to the standard approach at both 12 weeks and one year postoperatively. Radiographic analysis did not reveal differences in alignment variables between the two approaches. The results of this study suggest that minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty offers superior short-term as well as possible long-term results.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionKineticsKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresMuscle StrengthPatient SatisfactionQuadriceps Muscle

Identifiers

PMID19352654
PMCPMC2903138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.