Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19351417›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2009

Complementarity of ultrasound and fluorescence imaging in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

Cynthia S Snyder, Sharmeela Kaushal, Yuko Kono, Hop S Tran Cao, Robert M Hoffman, Michael Bouvet

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Canny edge-based deformable image registration.Physics in medicine and biology · 2017
    Article
  9. High-frequency Ultrasound Imaging of Mouse Cervical Lymph Nodes.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2015
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Diagnostic ultrasound imaging of mouse diaphragm function.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cynthia S SnyderMoores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, La Jolla, CA, USA. csnyder@ucsd.edu
Sharmeela Kaushal
Yuko Kono
Hop S Tran Cao
Robert M Hoffman
Michael Bouvet
University of California, San Diego · USMoores Cancer Center

Funding

UCSD Cancer Center Training Program in Drug DevelopmentT32CA121938 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Michael Bouvet, Dwayne G. Stupack · 2006 to 2026
$10.3M
Imageable Mouse Models of Pancreatic CancerR33CA109949 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BOUVET, MICHAEL · 2007 to 2008
$577k
Imageable Mouse Models of Pancreatic CancerR21CA109949 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI BOUVET, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2005
$341k
NCI NIH HHS CA109949NCI NIH HHS T32 CA121938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic cancer is a devastating disease characterized by dismal 5-year survival rates and limited treatment options. In an effort to provide useful models for preclinical evaluation of new experimental therapeutics, we and others have developed orthotopic mouse models of pancreatic cancer. The utility of these models for pre-clinical testing is dependent upon quantitative, noninvasive methods for monitoring in vivo tumor progression in real time. Toward this goal, we performed whole-body fluorescence imaging and ultrasound imaging to evaluate and to compare these noninvasive imaging modalities for assessing tumor burden and tumor progression in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

methodsThe human pancreatic cancer cell line XPA-1, engineered for stable, high-level expression of red fluorescent protein (RFP), was implanted into the pancreas of nude mice using orthotopic implantation. The tumors were allowed to grow over a period of one to several weeks during which time the mice were imaged using both fluorescence imaging and ultrasound imaging to measure tumor burden and to monitor tumor growth.

resultsWhole-body fluorescence imaging and ultrasound imaging both allowed for the visualization and measurement of orthotopic pancreatic tumor implants in vivo. The imaging sessions were well-tolerated by the mice and yielded data which correlated well in the quantitative assessment of tumor burden. Whole-body fluorescence and two-dimensional ultrasound imaging showed a strong correlation for measurement of tumor size over a range of tumor sizes (R(2) = 0.6627, P = 0.003 for an exposure time of 67 msec and R(2) = 0.6553, P = 0.003 for an exposure time of 120 msec).

conclusionOur findings suggest a complementary role for fluorescence imaging and ultrasound imaging in assessing tumor burden and tumor progression in orthotopic mouse models of human cancer.

Indexed as

Tumor BurdenAnimalsCell Line, TumorDiagnostic ImagingDisease Models, AnimalFluorescenceHumansLuminescent ProteinsMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm TransplantationPancreatic NeoplasmsRed Fluorescent ProteinUltrasonographyLuminescent ProteinsRed Fluorescent Protein

Identifiers

PMID19351417
PMCPMC2679761
OpenAlexW2008375226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.