ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2009
Cost-effectiveness model comparing olanzapine and other oral atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia in the United States.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Economic Models Across the Entire Schizophrenia Pathway.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review of the methods of health economic models assessing antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.PharmacoEconomics · 2013Pooled it
- Village doctor-assisted case management of rural patients with schizophrenia: protocol for a cluster randomized control trial.Implementation science : IS · 2014Trial
- Healthcare Resource Utilization 6 Months Before and After Olanzapine/Samidorphan Initiation: Real-World Assessment of Patients with Schizophrenia or Bipolar I Disorder.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of ten commonly used antipsychotics in first-episode schizophrenia in the UK: economic evaluation based on aThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2025Article
- Usage and cost-effectiveness of anti-psychotics in psychiatry OPD among various clinical conditions: A prospective observational study in a tertiary care center.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2023Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Aripiprazole Tablets with Sensor versus Oral Atypical Antipsychotics for the Treatment of Schizophrenia Using a Patient-Level Microsimulation Modeling Approach.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2023Article
- Healthcare resource utilization and costs before and after long-acting injectable antipsychotic initiation in commercially insured young adults with schizophrenia.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Transitioning from Once-Monthly to Once-Every-3-Months Paliperidone Palmitate Among Veterans with Schizophrenia.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2021Article
- Schizophrenia Treatment with Second-Generation Antipsychotics: A Multi-Country Comparison of the Costs of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Adverse Events and Weight Gain.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2021Article
- Systematic review of utility values used in the pharmacoeconomic evaluations for schizophrenia: implications on cost-effectiveness results.Journal of market access & health policy · 2019Review
- Systematic review of pharmacoeconomic models for schizophrenia.Journal of market access & health policy · 2018Review
- Healthcare resource use in schizophrenia, EuroSC findings.Journal of market access & health policy · 2017Article
- Long-term cost-effectiveness of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of adults with schizophrenia in the US.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2013Article
- Estimated economic benefits from low-frequency administration of atypical antipsychotics in treatment of schizophrenia: a decision model.Annals of general psychiatry · 2012Article
- 'Generic to genetic' transition in cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric drugs: opportunity for personalized medicine.Pharmacogenomics · 2012Article
- Sulfotransferase 4A1 Haplotype 1 (SULT4A1-1) Is Associated With Decreased Hospitalization Events in Antipsychotic-Treated Patients With Schizophrenia.The primary care companion for CNS disorders · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSchizophrenia is often a persistent and costly illness that requires continued treatment with antipsychotics. Differences among antipsychotics on efficacy, safety, tolerability, adherence, and cost have cost-effectiveness implications for treating schizophrenia. This study compares the cost-effectiveness of oral olanzapine, oral risperidone (at generic cost, primary comparator), quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia from the perspective of third-party payers in the U.S. health care system.
methodsA 1-year microsimulation economic decision model, with quarterly cycles, was developed to simulate the dynamic nature of usual care of schizophrenia patients who switch, continue, discontinue, and restart their medications. The model captures clinical and cost parameters including adherence levels, relapse with and without hospitalization, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), treatment discontinuation by reason, treatment-emergent adverse events, suicide, health care resource utilization, and direct medical care costs. Published medical literature and a clinical expert panel were used to develop baseline model assumptions. Key model outcomes included mean annual total direct cost per treatment, cost per stable patient, and incremental cost-effectiveness values per QALY gained.
resultsThe results of the microsimulation model indicated that olanzapine had the lowest mean annual direct health care cost ($8,544) followed by generic risperidone ($9,080). In addition, olanzapine resulted in more QALYs than risperidone (0.733 vs. 0.719). The base case and multiple sensitivity analyses found olanzapine to be the dominant choice in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness per QALY gained.
conclusionThe utilization of olanzapine is predicted in this model to result in better clinical outcomes and lower total direct health care costs compared to generic risperidone, quetiapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole. Olanzapine may, therefore, be a cost-effective therapeutic option for patients with schizophrenia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.