ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2010
Men with prostate cancer over the first year of illness: their experiences as biographical disruption.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Qualitative studies on men with prostate cancer: a systematic meta-synthesis.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025Pooled it
- Body image, self-esteem, and sense of masculinity in patients with prostate cancer: a qualitative meta-synthesis.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022Pooled it
- Conceptual framework for living with and beyond cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Psycho-oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Prostate Cancer Patient Perspectives on the Use of Information in Treatment Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2017Pooled it
- Between illness and health: A scoping review of cancer experience through the construct of liminality.Journal of health psychology · 2026Article
- 'Out of the frying pan into the fire': a qualitative study of the impact on masculinity for men living with advanced prostate cancer.Palliative care and social practice · 2023Article
- Certainty within uncertainty: a qualitative study of the experience of metastatic melanoma patients undergoing pembrolizumab immunotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019Article
- Liminality and head and neck cancer: core concepts and applications for clinical practice.Ecancermedicalscience · 2019Article
- Threat of biographical disruption: the gendered construction and experience of infertility following cancer for women and men.BMC cancer · 2018Article
- "My cancer is not my deepest concern": life course disruption influencing patient pathways and health care needs among persons living with colorectal cancer.Patient preference and adherence · 2016Article
- Adaptation of the illness trajectory framework to describe the work of transitional cancer survivorship.Oncology nursing forum · 2012Article
- Cancer as biographical disruption: constructions of living with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012Article
- Four aspects of self-image close to death at home.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
goalsThis paper is one of five interrelated papers about cancer, drawn from a larger study exploring the experiences of 66 people diagnosed with cancer. Findings are reported separately because the way in which people experience cancer can vary by cancer type. Here, we determine the utility of liminality and biographical disruption as explanatory theories in relation to men's experiences of prostate cancer. We situate and explore notions of liminality and disruption in relation to self, identity and context to inform debate about the provision of supportive care and highlight the contribution this study makes to the understandings of men's health. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a qualitative interview study of 66 people diagnosed with cancer. The study included five cancer types: gynaecological, prostate, lung, breast and colorectal. This paper illustrates the experiences of ten men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Three serial interviews were conducted at (1) diagnosis, (2) treatment and (3) follow-up. Drawing on the constant comparative method (Glaser and Strauss 1967), a descriptive and thematic approach to data analysis was adopted. This descriptive analysis evidenced that cancer caused disruption to people's lives. In order to move beyond this level of description, begin to explain this and develop theoretical insight, we drew on concepts of biographical disruption (Bury, Sociol Health Illn 4(2):167-182, 1982; Bury, Sociol Health Illn 13(4):451-468, 1991; Bury, Sociol Health Illn 23(3):263-285, 2001) and liminality (Navon and Morag, Soc Sci Med 58(11):2337-2347, 2004). MAIN
resultsNotions of biography and identity weave their way through men's accounts of prostate cancer. Physical side effects and reconstructed futures each form key parts of men's narratives.
conclusionsOur findings add to existing knowledge of supportive care needs for men living with prostate cancer. We suggest that studies exploring supportive care need to remain mindful of the disruption that cancer causes both during and after treatment, the complexity of such experience and respective demands on supportive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.