Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19350229›Full record

ReviewExperimental brain research2009

Translational nociceptor research as guide to human pain perceptions and pathophysiology.

Barbara Namer, Hermann Otto Handwerker

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental brain research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PIEZO2-dependent rapid pain system in humans and mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Current challenges in translational pain research.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Nociceptors: the sensors of the pain pathway.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2010
    Review
  10. Nociceptors: a phylogenetic view.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara NamerDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institut für Physiologie und Pathophysiologie, University of Erlangen/Nuernberg, Universitätsstr. 17, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Hermann Otto Handwerker
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microneurography is a method for recording single unit action potentials with microelectrodes from the nerves of awake cooperating humans. Although this method is now in use since almost 40 years, its potency has been strengthened by the recent technical developments. A great progress was the discovery that different functional groups of nociceptors are characterized by a distinctly different post-excitatory slowing of their conduction velocities. Microneurography is now powerful enough to analyze the nerve activity pattern of enigmatic sensations such as pruritus. Furthermore, it is the only method providing direct insight in the changes which human nerves undergo with aging. Recently, reliable recordings from patients suffering from painful neuropathies came into reach. It has been shown that different types of neuropathies are characterized by different patterns of abnormal nociceptor functions. Although some of them are characterized by abnormal spontaneous activity in C-nociceptors, others show mainly signs of denervation. Microneurography is, therefore, a tool for translational studies on human nociceptor functions by linking direct animal studies on experimental neuropathies with human diseases.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAgingAnimalsBrainHumansNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedNeural ConductionNociceptorsPainPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesPruritus

Identifiers

PMID19350229
OpenAlexW2150259505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.