Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19350209›Full record

ReviewJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2009

Macrophages in breast cancer: do involution macrophages account for the poor prognosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer?

Jenean O'Brien, Pepper Schedin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Postpartum breast cancer: mechanisms underlying its worse prognosis, treatment implications, and fertility preservation.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Linking Race, Cancer Outcomes, and Tissue Repair.The American journal of pathology · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jenean O'BrienDepartment of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80045, USA.
Pepper Schedin

Funding

NCI NIH HHS BC060531NCI NIH HHS BC073482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophage influx is associated with negative outcomes for women with breast cancer and has been demonstrated to be required for metastasis of mammary tumors in mouse models. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer is characterized by particularly poor outcomes, however the reasons remain obscure. Recently, post-pregnancy mammary involution has been characterized as having a wound healing signature. We have proposed the involution-hypothesis, which states that the wound healing microenvironment of the involuting gland is tumor promotional. Macrophage influx is one of the prominent features of the involuting gland, identifying the macrophage a potential instigator of tumor progression and a novel target for breast cancer treatment and prevention.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLactationMacrophagesMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMatrix MetalloproteinasesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm ProteinsNeovascularization, PathologicExtracellular Matrix ProteinsMatrix MetalloproteinasesNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19350209
PMCPMC2693782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.