Successful engraftment of cord blood following a one-day reduced-intensity conditioning regimen in two patients suffering primary graft failure and sepsis.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Salvage Cord Blood Transplantation Using a Short-term Reduced-intensity Conditioning Regimen for Graft Failure.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022
   Article
2. Feasibility of salvage cord blood transplantation using a fludarabine, melphalan, and low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin conditioning regimen.International journal of hematology · 2019
   Article
3. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning for patients with adrenoleukodystrophy.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2019
   Article
4. Feasibility of salvage cord blood transplantation following fludarabine, melphalan and low-dose TBI for graft rejection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2016
   Article
5. Graft failure in cord blood transplantation successfully treated with short-term reduced-intensity conditioning regimen and second allogeneic transplantation.International journal of hematology · 2010
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as