Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19349632›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2009

Systematic review: association of low-density lipoprotein subfractions with cardiovascular outcomes.

Stanley Ip, Alice H Lichtenstein, Mei Chung, Joseph Lau, Ethan M Balk

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Associations of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with lipid and lipoprotein profiles.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stanley IpTufts Medical Center and Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts 02111, USA.
Alice H Lichtenstein
Mei Chung
Joseph Lau
Ethan M Balk

Funding

DIETARY FAT, PLASMA LIPIDS AND OTHER CHD RISK FACTORS.R01HL054727 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI LICHTENSTEIN, ALICE H · 1996 to 2003
$1.2M
Cholesterol Homeostasis in Framingham Offspring StudyR01HL074388 · NHLBI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI LICHTENSTEIN, ALICE H · 2003 to 2006
$772k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL054727NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL074388PHS HHS 290-02-0022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasures of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions have been proposed as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. PURPOSE: To review published studies that reported relationships between LDL subfractions and cardiovascular outcomes. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1950 to 5 January 2009), CAB Abstracts (1973 to 30 June 2008), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2nd quarter of 2008), limited to English-language studies. STUDY SELECTION: 3 reviewers selected longitudinal studies with 10 or more participants that reported an association between LDL subfractions and incidence or severity of cardiovascular disease and in which plasma samples were collected before outcome determination. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted from 24 studies. The 10 studies that used analytical methods available for clinical use (all of which used nuclear magnetic resonance) had full data extraction, including quality assessment (good, fair, or poor). All studies were extracted by 1 researcher and verified by another. DATA SYNTHESIS: All 24 studies, and the subset of 10 nuclear magnetic resonance studies, were heterogeneous in terms of the specific tests analyzed, analytical methods used, participants investigated, and outcomes measured. Higher LDL particle number was consistently associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease, independent of other lipid measurements. Other LDL subfractions were generally not associated with cardiovascular disease after adjustment for cholesterol concentrations. No study evaluated the incremental value of LDL subfractions beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors or their test performance. LIMITATION: Publication bias was a possibility.

conclusionHigher LDL particle number has been associated with cardiovascular disease incidence, but studies have not determined whether any measures of LDL subfractions add incremental benefit to traditional risk factor assessment. Routine use of clinically available LDL subfraction tests to estimate cardiovascular disease risk is premature.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDisease ProgressionHumansIncidenceLipoproteins, LDLNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularRisk FactorsLipoproteins, LDL

Identifiers

PMID19349632
PMCPMC6880859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.