Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19349218›Full record

ArticleJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences2009

Purification of polyclonal anti-conformational antibodies for use in affinity selection from random peptide phage display libraries: a study using the hydatid vaccine EG95.

A J Read, C G Gauci, M W Lightowlers

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification and characterization of a novel lytic peptidoglycan transglycosylase (MltC) in Shigella dysenteriae.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A J ReadThe University of Melbourne, Veterinary Clinical Centre, Werribee, Victoria, Australia. andrew.j.read@dpi.nsw.gov.au
C G Gauci
M W Lightowlers

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of polyclonal antibodies to screen random peptide phage display libraries often results in the recognition of a large number of peptides that mimic linear epitopes on various proteins. There appears to be a bias in the use of this technology toward the selection of peptides that mimic linear epitopes. In many circumstances the correct folding of a protein immunogen is required for conferring protection. The use of random peptide phage display libraries to identify peptide mimics of conformational epitopes in these cases requires a strategy for overcoming this bias. Conformational epitopes on the hydatid vaccine EG95 have been shown to result in protective immunity in sheep, whereas linear epitopes are not protective. In this paper we describe a strategy that results in the purification of polyclonal antibodies directed against conformational epitopes while eliminating antibodies directed against linear epitopes. These affinity purified antibodies were then used to select a peptide from a random peptide phage display library that has the capacity to mimic conformational epitopes on EG95. This peptide was subsequently used to affinity purify monospecific antibodies against EG95.

Indexed as

Peptide LibraryAnimalsAntibodiesAntigens, HelminthChromatography, AffinityEchinococcus granulosusGerbillinaeHelminth ProteinsVaccinesAntibodiesAntigens, HelminthEG95 protein, Echinococcus granulosusHelminth ProteinsPeptide LibraryVaccines

Identifiers

PMID19349218
PMCPMC2682179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.